2004-06-08 21:03:26

by FabF

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.7-rc3] nr_free_files ?

Andrew,

Here's a patch removing nr_free_files.This one is unused in the whole
tree + file-nr was tri-int exposed in /proc.This patch gives file-nr
simple integer as file-max.Could you apply if this doesn't break
historical features ?

Regards,
FabF


Attachments:
filenr1.diff (868.00 B)

2004-06-08 21:14:33

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.7-rc3] nr_free_files ?

FabF <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Here's a patch removing nr_free_files.

It changes the format of /proc/sys/fs/file-nr.

2004-06-08 22:19:23

by Chris Wedgwood

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.7-rc3] nr_free_files ?

On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 02:17:12PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> It changes the format of /proc/sys/fs/file-nr.

For 2.7.x is think that's fine but clearly for 2.6.x it's not. Are we
starting to queue stuff for 2.7.x yet? :)


--cw

2004-06-12 13:54:07

by FabF

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.7-rc3] nr_free_files ?

On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 00:19, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 02:17:12PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > It changes the format of /proc/sys/fs/file-nr.
>
> For 2.7.x is think that's fine but clearly for 2.6.x it's not. Are we
> starting to queue stuff for 2.7.x yet? :)
Who _can_ do that ?

FabF
>
>
> --cw
>