Gerd Knorr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> This is a major update of the cx88 driver.
drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-dvb.c:215: `FE_UNREGISTER' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-dvb.c:215: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-dvb.c:215: for each function it appears in.)
drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-dvb.c: In function `dvb_register':
drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-dvb.c:232: `FE_REGISTER' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-dvb.c:294: `FE_UNREGISTER' undeclared (first use in this function)
I'll drop this one - please wholly resend it.
Hi,
On 17.09.2004 01:08, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Gerd Knorr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>This is a major update of the cx88 driver.
> drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-dvb.c:215: `FE_UNREGISTER' undeclared (first use in this function)
> drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-dvb.c:215: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-dvb.c:215: for each function it appears in.)
> drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-dvb.c: In function `dvb_register':
> drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-dvb.c:232: `FE_REGISTER' undeclared (first use in this function)
> drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-dvb.c:294: `FE_UNREGISTER' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> I'll drop this one - please wholly resend it.
Currently bttv/cx88 and DVB in general get more and more interwoven.
I have been waiting for Gerd to submit his latest bttv patches, so I can
send off my DVB patches.
Gerd's latest patch depends on my not-yet-submitted patches, so just
simply drop this one. Gerd and I are going to coordinate this and
resubmit it again. Ok, Gerd?
CU
Michael.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 08:37:35AM +0200, Michael Hunold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17.09.2004 01:08, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >Gerd Knorr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>This is a major update of the cx88 driver.
>
> >drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-dvb.c:215: `FE_UNREGISTER' undeclared (first
> >use in this function)
Whoops. That wasn't intentional ...
> Gerd's latest patch depends on my not-yet-submitted patches, so just
> simply drop this one. Gerd and I are going to coordinate this and
> resubmit it again. Ok, Gerd?
I have a (temporary) #define for FE_(UN)REGISTER in there to relax the
dependencies between cx88 + dvb core a bit. That way it is only a
runtime dependency and only for the dvb part of the cx88 driver.
Unfortunaly the #define catched only one of the two cases where it is
needed, and I didn't notice the second one as I'm working with a
dvb-patched kernel to actually test the stuff ...
Whats your planned timeframe for submitting the dvb updates? I'd love
to see a working cx88 dvb driver in 2.6.9.
Gerd
--
return -ENOSIG;