Alan,
what 'tty' did you mean here? gcc says its undeclared.
should that be sclp_tty and sclp_vt220_tty?
diff -Nru a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_tty.c b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_tty.c
--- a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_tty.c 2004-09-29 20:07:09 -07:00
+++ b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_tty.c 2004-09-29 20:07:09 -07:00
@@ -277,10 +277,7 @@
wake_up(&sclp_tty_waitq);
/* check if the tty needs a wake up call */
if (sclp_tty != NULL) {
- if ((sclp_tty->flags & (1 << TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP)) &&
- sclp_tty->ldisc.write_wakeup)
- (sclp_tty->ldisc.write_wakeup)(sclp_tty);
- wake_up_interruptible(&sclp_tty->write_wait);
+ tty_wakeup(tty);
}
}
diff -Nru a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_vt220.c b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_vt220.c
--- a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_vt220.c 2004-09-29 20:06:20 -07:00
+++ b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_vt220.c 2004-09-29 20:06:20 -07:00
@@ -139,10 +139,7 @@
wake_up(&sclp_vt220_waitq);
/* Check if the tty needs a wake up call */
if (sclp_vt220_tty != NULL) {
- if ((sclp_vt220_tty->flags & (1 << TTY_DO_WRITE_WAKEUP)) &&
- (sclp_vt220_tty->ldisc.write_wakeup != NULL))
- (sclp_vt220_tty->ldisc.write_wakeup)(sclp_vt220_tty);
- wake_up_interruptible(&sclp_vt220_tty->write_wait);
+ tty_wakeup(tty);
}
}
--
USB is for mice, FireWire is for men!
sUse lINUX ag, nÜRNBERG
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 02:52:20PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Alan,
> should that be sclp_tty and sclp_vt220_tty?
Yes. The patch is correct.