Hi,
Does anyone know whether the BKCVS repository
(rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.5) is still
updated? The last ChangeSet,v revision I got is 1.26750 which was
checked in more than a week ago.
(Sorry if I missed some e-mails about a planned down-time)
Thanks,
Catalin
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:45:26PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know whether the BKCVS repository
> (rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.5) is still
> updated? The last ChangeSet,v revision I got is 1.26750 which was
> checked in more than a week ago.
>
> (Sorry if I missed some e-mails about a planned down-time)
I see the same here.
In a message dated February 14, Larry said:
> I'm taking off for a week long vacation starting Wednesday and I won't
> have email access.
He should be back now, maybe he can tell us more about what happened ?
Stelian.
--
Stelian Pop <[email protected]>
> He should be back now, maybe he can tell us more about what happened ?
We had a nameserver problem and the machine dedicated to this didn't get
updated with a new resolve.conf. It's fixed now and updating, probably
be there in an hour.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:02:18AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > He should be back now, maybe he can tell us more about what happened ?
>
> We had a nameserver problem and the machine dedicated to this didn't get
> updated with a new resolve.conf. It's fixed now and updating, probably
> be there in an hour.
I confirm it works again, thanks.
While you're at it, could you please increase the rate of update,
as we discussed a few weeks ago ?
Thanks.
Stelian.
--
Stelian Pop <[email protected]>
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 12:49:53PM +0100, Stelian Pop wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 10:02:18AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> > > He should be back now, maybe he can tell us more about what happened ?
> >
> > We had a nameserver problem and the machine dedicated to this didn't get
> > updated with a new resolve.conf. It's fixed now and updating, probably
> > be there in an hour.
>
> I confirm it works again, thanks.
>
> While you're at it, could you please increase the rate of update,
> as we discussed a few weeks ago ?
Yes but I want to think about it a bit, I need to go relearn how it
picks the changesets it exports 1:1 to CVS commits vs the csets that
get collapsed into the merge nodes. I'm worried that more frequent
exports may result yield suboptimal results. If that's not true then
we'll export it every few hours or every time bkbits.net gets updated.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com