I am using the 2.4.0-test10 kernel. I have a sound blaster 16 which
works fine under 2.2.17.
I see that a while back someone posted on this problem previously but
there were no answers I can find..
Is support for soundblaster16 ISA broken in the 2.4 kernel? Compiled in
or used as a module I can not get it to work. I have passed sb=220,5,1,5
during boot when compiled in and also sent those during insmod.
When I boot to 2.2.17 these are the correct values and sound is happy :)
I am subbed to this group so you may answer here so this is on record.
Thanks much...
--
Jim Bonnet
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 12:53:18PM -0800, Jim Bonnet wrote:
> I am using the 2.4.0-test10 kernel. I have a sound blaster 16 which
> works fine under 2.2.17.
>
> I see that a while back someone posted on this problem previously but
> there were no answers I can find..
>
> Is support for soundblaster16 ISA broken in the 2.4 kernel? Compiled in
> or used as a module I can not get it to work. I have passed sb=220,5,1,5
> during boot when compiled in and also sent those during insmod.
Use sb=0x220,5,1,5
Kurt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jim Bonnet wrote:
> I am using the 2.4.0-test10 kernel. I have a sound blaster 16 which
> works fine under 2.2.17.
>
> I see that a while back someone posted on this problem previously but
> there were no answers I can find..
>
> Is support for soundblaster16 ISA broken in the 2.4 kernel? Compiled in
> or used as a module I can not get it to work. I have passed sb=220,5,1,5
> during boot when compiled in and also sent those during insmod.
>
> When I boot to 2.2.17 these are the correct values and sound is happy :)
>
> I am subbed to this group so you may answer here so this is on record.
>
> Thanks much...
What does 2.4.* say Jim?
You have the right modutils installed?
Any error msg?
I have an old SB16 ISA and it works without a problem on 2.4.0-test10.
And it hasn't caused me any problems for a very long time :)
I have sound compiled as modules.
My lilo.conf (sound part) looks like this.
path[sound]=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/drivers/sound
alias sound-service-0-0 opl3
alias sound-slot-0 sb
options sound dmabuf=1
alias midi opl3
options opl3 io=0x388
options sb io=0x220 irq=7 dma=1 dma16=5 mpu_io=0x330
I have no idea if the sound-service-0-0 and sound-slot-0 part is right
but it works and dosn't give any errors. I haven't had time to check what
service and slot really affects...
Do you get any errors while inserting the modules?
/Richard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6CbxjUSLExYo23RsRAtceAKCfB+8rU1vpBp8GaF2rL7LzUjVB7wCg6yGE
6p0NWko/dIB7/X36nILXGFc=
=gal1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Richard Torkar wrote:
> Jim Bonnet wrote:
>
> > I am using the 2.4.0-test10 kernel. I have a sound blaster 16 which
> > works fine under 2.2.17.
> >
> > I see that a while back someone posted on this problem previously but
> > there were no answers I can find..
> >
> > Is support for soundblaster16 ISA broken in the 2.4 kernel? Compiled in
> > or used as a module I can not get it to work. I have passed sb=220,5,1,5
> > during boot when compiled in and also sent those during insmod.
> >
> > When I boot to 2.2.17 these are the correct values and sound is happy :)
> >
> > I am subbed to this group so you may answer here so this is on record.
> >
> > Thanks much...
>
>
> What does 2.4.* say Jim?
> You have the right modutils installed?
> Any error msg?
>
> I have an old SB16 ISA and it works without a problem on 2.4.0-test10.
> And it hasn't caused me any problems for a very long time :)
>
> I have sound compiled as modules.
> My lilo.conf (sound part) looks like this.
^^^^^^^^^
Correction modules.conf I mean *duuuh*
>
> path[sound]=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/drivers/sound
> alias sound-service-0-0 opl3
> alias sound-slot-0 sb
> options sound dmabuf=1
> alias midi opl3
> options opl3 io=0x388
> options sb io=0x220 irq=7 dma=1 dma16=5 mpu_io=0x330
>
> I have no idea if the sound-service-0-0 and sound-slot-0 part is right
> but it works and dosn't give any errors. I haven't had time to check what
> service and slot really affects...
>
> Do you get any errors while inserting the modules?
>
>
>
> /Richard
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> ------------ Output from gpg ------------
> gpg: Signature made Wed 08 Nov 2000 09:49:39 PM CET using DSA key ID 8A36DD1B
> gpg: Good signature from "Richard Torkar (Linux) <[email protected]>"
>
>
/Richard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6Cb5IUSLExYo23RsRAhWPAKC2seiMwCKfQaDhs0/eYrUhorciXQCg4bwh
VMBEDzjthtT6bjEn69mtAcM=
=83jY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----