From: Kaixu Xia <[email protected]>
The '>=' expression itself is bool, no need to convert it to bool.
Fix the following coccicheck warning:
./sound/soc/codecs/wcd9335.c:3982:25-30: WARNING: conversion to bool not needed here
Reported-by: Tosk Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/codecs/wcd9335.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wcd9335.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wcd9335.c
index f2d9d52ee171..843c311ea79e 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wcd9335.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wcd9335.c
@@ -3979,7 +3979,7 @@ static irqreturn_t wcd9335_slimbus_irq(int irq, void *data)
}
for_each_set_bit(j, &status, 32) {
- tx = (j >= 16 ? true : false);
+ tx = (j >= 16);
port_id = (tx ? j - 16 : j);
regmap_read(wcd->if_regmap,
WCD9335_SLIM_PGD_PORT_INT_RX_SOURCE0 + j, &val);
--
2.20.0
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 16:53:36 +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> The '>=' expression itself is bool, no need to convert it to bool.
> Fix the following coccicheck warning:
>
> ./sound/soc/codecs/wcd9335.c:3982:25-30: WARNING: conversion to bool not needed here
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: wcd9335: Remove unnecessary conversion to bool
commit: a5ec7c9e007b1095d04146eb94bac3863d35a69d
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark