The double `Address' in the comment in line 487 is repeated. Remove one
of them from the comment.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
---
arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h
index c02fe823effc..61411619dff3 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@
/*
- * Bank Address Address Bits Register (Table 6-22)
+ * Bank Address Bits Register (Table 6-22)
*/
#define S_MC_BA_RESERVED 0
--
2.34.1
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 04:57:15PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> The double `Address' in the comment in line 487 is repeated. Remove one
> of them from the comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h
> index c02fe823effc..61411619dff3 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250_mc.h
> @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@
>
>
> /*
> - * Bank Address Address Bits Register (Table 6-22)
> + * Bank Address Bits Register (Table 6-22)
> */
>
> #define S_MC_BA_RESERVED 0
> --
> 2.34.1
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]