2021-12-22 14:21:04

by Johan Hovold

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] media: davinci: vpif: drop probe printk

Drivers should generally not print anything for a successful probe, and
printing "success" before probe is done makes no sense.

Drop the unnecessary and misleading dev_info() call from probe.

Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <[email protected]>
---
drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c
index 4a260f4ed236..03b4e51bb13a 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c
@@ -456,8 +456,6 @@ static int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
pm_runtime_get(&pdev->dev);

- dev_info(&pdev->dev, "vpif probe success\n");
-
/*
* If VPIF Node has endpoints, assume "new" DT support,
* where capture and display drivers don't have DT nodes
--
2.32.0



2022-01-04 18:31:50

by Lad, Prabhakar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] media: davinci: vpif: drop probe printk

Hi Johan,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 2:20 PM Johan Hovold <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Drivers should generally not print anything for a successful probe, and
> printing "success" before probe is done makes no sense.
>
> Drop the unnecessary and misleading dev_info() call from probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <[email protected]>

Cheers,
Prabhakar

> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c
> index 4a260f4ed236..03b4e51bb13a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c
> @@ -456,8 +456,6 @@ static int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> pm_runtime_get(&pdev->dev);
>
> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "vpif probe success\n");
> -
> /*
> * If VPIF Node has endpoints, assume "new" DT support,
> * where capture and display drivers don't have DT nodes
> --
> 2.32.0
>