2022-01-28 13:21:37

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 0/3] 4.19.227-rc1 review

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.227 release.
There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.227-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 4.19.227-rc1

Jan Kara <[email protected]>
select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout()

Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>
net: bridge: clear bridge's private skb space on xmit

Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store


-------------

Diffstat:

Makefile | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_object.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 6 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 4 ++
fs/select.c | 63 ++++++++++++++------------
net/bridge/br_device.c | 2 +
8 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)



2022-01-28 13:23:16

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 3/3] select: Fix indefinitely sleeping task in poll_schedule_timeout()

From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

commit 68514dacf2715d11b91ca50d88de047c086fea9c upstream.

A task can end up indefinitely sleeping in do_select() ->
poll_schedule_timeout() when the following race happens:

TASK1 (thread1) TASK2 TASK1 (thread2)
do_select()
setup poll_wqueues table
with 'fd'
write data to 'fd'
pollwake()
table->triggered = 1
closes 'fd' thread1 is
waiting for
poll_schedule_timeout()
- sees table->triggered
table->triggered = 0
return -EINTR
loop back in do_select()

But at this point when TASK1 loops back, the fdget() in the setup of
poll_wqueues fails. So now so we never find 'fd' is ready for reading
and sleep in poll_schedule_timeout() indefinitely.

Treat an fd that got closed as a fd on which some event happened. This
makes sure cannot block indefinitely in do_select().

Another option would be to return -EBADF in this case but that has a
potential of subtly breaking applications that excercise this behavior
and it happens to work for them. So returning fd as active seems like a
safer choice.

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
fs/select.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/select.c
+++ b/fs/select.c
@@ -431,9 +431,11 @@ get_max:
return max;
}

-#define POLLIN_SET (EPOLLRDNORM | EPOLLRDBAND | EPOLLIN | EPOLLHUP | EPOLLERR)
-#define POLLOUT_SET (EPOLLWRBAND | EPOLLWRNORM | EPOLLOUT | EPOLLERR)
-#define POLLEX_SET (EPOLLPRI)
+#define POLLIN_SET (EPOLLRDNORM | EPOLLRDBAND | EPOLLIN | EPOLLHUP | EPOLLERR |\
+ EPOLLNVAL)
+#define POLLOUT_SET (EPOLLWRBAND | EPOLLWRNORM | EPOLLOUT | EPOLLERR |\
+ EPOLLNVAL)
+#define POLLEX_SET (EPOLLPRI | EPOLLNVAL)

static inline void wait_key_set(poll_table *wait, unsigned long in,
unsigned long out, unsigned long bit,
@@ -500,6 +502,7 @@ static int do_select(int n, fd_set_bits
break;
if (!(bit & all_bits))
continue;
+ mask = EPOLLNVAL;
f = fdget(i);
if (f.file) {
wait_key_set(wait, in, out, bit,
@@ -507,34 +510,34 @@ static int do_select(int n, fd_set_bits
mask = vfs_poll(f.file, wait);

fdput(f);
- if ((mask & POLLIN_SET) && (in & bit)) {
- res_in |= bit;
- retval++;
- wait->_qproc = NULL;
- }
- if ((mask & POLLOUT_SET) && (out & bit)) {
- res_out |= bit;
- retval++;
- wait->_qproc = NULL;
- }
- if ((mask & POLLEX_SET) && (ex & bit)) {
- res_ex |= bit;
- retval++;
- wait->_qproc = NULL;
- }
- /* got something, stop busy polling */
- if (retval) {
- can_busy_loop = false;
- busy_flag = 0;
-
- /*
- * only remember a returned
- * POLL_BUSY_LOOP if we asked for it
- */
- } else if (busy_flag & mask)
- can_busy_loop = true;
-
}
+ if ((mask & POLLIN_SET) && (in & bit)) {
+ res_in |= bit;
+ retval++;
+ wait->_qproc = NULL;
+ }
+ if ((mask & POLLOUT_SET) && (out & bit)) {
+ res_out |= bit;
+ retval++;
+ wait->_qproc = NULL;
+ }
+ if ((mask & POLLEX_SET) && (ex & bit)) {
+ res_ex |= bit;
+ retval++;
+ wait->_qproc = NULL;
+ }
+ /* got something, stop busy polling */
+ if (retval) {
+ can_busy_loop = false;
+ busy_flag = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * only remember a returned
+ * POLL_BUSY_LOOP if we asked for it
+ */
+ } else if (busy_flag & mask)
+ can_busy_loop = true;
+
}
if (res_in)
*rinp = res_in;


2022-01-28 14:26:26

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 2/3] net: bridge: clear bridges private skb space on xmit

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>

commit fd65e5a95d08389444e8591a20538b3edece0e15 upstream.

We need to clear all of the bridge private skb variables as they can be
stale due to the packet being recirculated through the stack and then
transmitted through the bridge device. Similar memset is already done on
bridge's input. We've seen cases where proxyarp_replied was 1 on routed
multicast packets transmitted through the bridge to ports with neigh
suppress which were getting dropped. Same thing can in theory happen with
the port isolation bit as well.

Fixes: 821f1b21cabb ("bridge: add new BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS port flag to suppress arp and nd flood")
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Huang Guobin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
net/bridge/br_device.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/net/bridge/br_device.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_device.c
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ netdev_tx_t br_dev_xmit(struct sk_buff *
struct ethhdr *eth;
u16 vid = 0;

+ memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(struct br_input_skb_cb));
+
rcu_read_lock();
nf_ops = rcu_dereference(nf_br_ops);
if (nf_ops && nf_ops->br_dev_xmit_hook(skb)) {


2022-01-28 16:52:58

by Pavel Machek

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 0/3] 4.19.227-rc1 review

Hi!

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.227 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

CIP testing did not find any problems here:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4.19.y

Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>

Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany


Attachments:
(No filename) (660.00 B)
signature.asc (201.00 B)
Download all attachments

2022-01-29 07:02:29

by Shuah Khan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 0/3] 4.19.227-rc1 review

On 1/27/22 11:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.227 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.227-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>

thanks,
-- Shuah

2022-01-31 11:06:07

by Sudip Mukherjee

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 0/3] 4.19.227-rc1 review

Hi Greg,

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:00PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.227 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 116 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/664


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>

--
Regards
Sudip

2022-01-31 22:33:08

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 0/3] 4.19.227-rc1 review

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 07:09:00PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.227 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>

Build results:
total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 425 pass: 425 fail: 0

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>

Guenter

2022-02-01 01:17:30

by Naresh Kamboju

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 0/3] 4.19.227-rc1 review

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 23:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.227 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:02:51 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.227-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>

## Build
* kernel: 4.19.227-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-4.19.y
* git commit: 0f7abe705832c477bd2571c77981ca3034202ace
* git describe: v4.19.226-4-g0f7abe705832
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.226-4-g0f7abe705832

## Test Regressions (compared to v4.19.225-239-gcedebae149c2)
No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.19.225-239-gcedebae149c2)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v4.19.225-239-gcedebae149c2)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.19.225-239-gcedebae149c2)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 78421, pass: 63758, fail: 737, skip: 12182, xfail: 1744

## Build Summary
* arm: 250 total, 246 passed, 4 failed
* arm64: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 19 total, 19 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 52 total, 48 passed, 4 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org