This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.229 release.
There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.229-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 4.19.229-rc1
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path
Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
cgroup-v1: Require capabilities to set release_agent
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++--
drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +-
kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
commit bd2db32e7c3e35bd4d9b8bbff689434a50893546 upstream.
It was reported that the mmc host structure could be accessed after it
was freed in moxart_remove(), so fix this by saving the base register of
the device and using it instead of the pointer dereference.
Cc: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
Cc: Xiyu Yang <[email protected]>
Cc: Xin Xiong <[email protected]>
Cc: Xin Tan <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
Cc: Yang Li <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: stable <[email protected]>
Reported-by: whitehat002 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c
@@ -696,12 +696,12 @@ static int moxart_remove(struct platform
if (!IS_ERR(host->dma_chan_rx))
dma_release_channel(host->dma_chan_rx);
mmc_remove_host(mmc);
- mmc_free_host(mmc);
writel(0, host->base + REG_INTERRUPT_MASK);
writel(0, host->base + REG_POWER_CONTROL);
writel(readl(host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL) | CLK_OFF,
host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL);
+ mmc_free_host(mmc);
}
return 0;
}
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.229 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-4.19.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <[email protected]>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
On 2/9/22 12:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.229 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.229-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
thanks,
-- Shuah
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:02PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.229 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 116 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/736
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
--
Regards
Sudip
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 00:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.229 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.229-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
## Build
* kernel: 4.19.229-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-4.19.y
* git commit: 020dc380ec76524a264536664d516a5a4d7cd45d
* git describe: v4.19.227-90-g020dc380ec76
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.19.y/build/v4.19.227-90-g020dc380ec76
## Test Regressions (compared to v4.19.227-87-gb06b07466af8)
No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.19.227-87-gb06b07466af8)
No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v4.19.227-87-gb06b07466af8)
No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.19.227-87-gb06b07466af8)
No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 61877, pass: 52177, fail: 270, skip: 8370, xfail: 1060
## Build Summary
* arm: 130 total, 130 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 35 total, 35 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 52 total, 39 passed, 13 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 2:25 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.229 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.229-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
hello,
Compiled and booted kernel 4.19.229-rc1+ on :
Processor Information:
Socket Designation: FM2
Type: Central Processor
Family: A-Series
Manufacturer: AuthenticAMD
ID: 31 0F 61 00 FF FB 8B 17
Signature: Family 21, Model 19, Stepping 1
i have a new display card of nvidia chipset. iam using non-free drivers here.
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GP108 [GeForce
GT 1030] (rev a1) (from lspci output)
resources: irq:29 memory:fd000000-fdffffff memory:c0000000-cfffffff
memory:d0000000-d1ffffff ioport:e000(size=128) memory:c0000-dffff
(from "sudo lshw -c video" output)
dmesg related actions attached.
Tested-by: Jeffrin Jose T <[email protected]>
--
software engineer
rajagiri school of engineering and technology - autonomous
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:02PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.229 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 425 pass: 425 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Guenter