Hello,
This series adds devicetree nodes for SDX65. It adds reserved memory
nodes, SDHCI, smmu and tcsr mutex support.
Changes from v1:
- Addressed Mani's Comments and made necessary.
- Rebased on top of v5.18-rc2.
Thanks,
Rohit.
Rohit Agarwal (7):
ARM: dts: qcom: sdx65: Add reserved memory nodes
dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: Document the SDX65 compatible
ARM: dts: qcom: sdx65: Add support for SDHCI controller
dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for SDX65 SMMU
ARM: dts: qcom: sdx65: Enable ARM SMMU
ARM: dts: qcom: sdx65: Add support for TCSR Mutex
ARM: dts: qcom: sdx65: Add Shared memory manager support
.../devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 +
.../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 1 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx65-mtp.dts | 21 ++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-sdx65.dtsi | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
--
2.7.4
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:20:08 +0530, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
> This series adds devicetree nodes for SDX65. It adds reserved memory
> nodes, SDHCI, smmu and tcsr mutex support.
>
> Changes from v1:
> - Addressed Mani's Comments and made necessary.
> - Rebased on top of v5.18-rc2.
>
> [...]
Applied SMMU binding patch to will (for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates), thanks!
[4/7] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for SDX65 SMMU
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/5a4eb9163471
However, I must confess that I don't understand the point in updating
the binding documentation but not the driver. Should we be matching on
the new compatible string somewhere?
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev