2022-09-26 04:14:55

by Jiapeng Chong

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] acerhdf: remove unneeded semicolon

./drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c:344:2-3: Unneeded semicolon.

Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=2271
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <[email protected]>
---
drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c b/drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c
index a7407aa032ba..b48c6c5da147 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static void acerhdf_check_param(struct thermal_zone_device *thermal)
pr_err("fanoff temperature (%d) is above fanon temperature (%d), clamping to %d\n",
fanoff, fanon, fanon);
fanoff = fanon;
- };
+ }

trips[0].temperature = fanon;
trips[0].hysteresis = fanon - fanoff;
--
2.20.1.7.g153144c


2022-09-27 14:30:23

by Hans de Goede

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acerhdf: remove unneeded semicolon

Hi,

On 9/26/22 05:33, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> ./drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c:344:2-3: Unneeded semicolon.
>
> Link: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=2271
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c b/drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c
> index a7407aa032ba..b48c6c5da147 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/acerhdf.c
> @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static void acerhdf_check_param(struct thermal_zone_device *thermal)
> pr_err("fanoff temperature (%d) is above fanon temperature (%d), clamping to %d\n",
> fanoff, fanon, fanon);
> fanoff = fanon;
> - };
> + }
>
> trips[0].temperature = fanon;
> trips[0].hysteresis = fanon - fanoff;


This patch does not apply on my current for-next branch:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=for-next

I guess that this might be based on the thermal-zone changes which are going upstream
for 6.1 through another tree.

Please rebase + resend this once 6.1-rc1 is out.

Regards,

Hans