2007-08-11 18:58:01

by Willy Tarreau

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [2.6.20.16 review 00/28] 2.6.20.16 -stable review

I proposed Chris and Greg to continue issuing a few more 2.6.20 releases
during the time needed for 2.6.21 and 2.6.22 to show a significant drop
in their patch rates, which hopefully will be just a matter of a few
releases.

My goal is *not* to do all the hard work they do, but just to backport
from their patches those which are meaningful for 2.6.20. For this
reason, 2.6.20 releases will always be slightly late and should not
contain patches not merged in more recent releases.

My intent with this version is to catch up with 2.6.21.7. Other patches
are already pending for future releases, but one thing at a time. I'm
trying to follow the same review/release process, so 28 patches will
be posted for review in response to this message.

If some people think it's useless to repost individual patches that have
already been reviewed in more recent versions, I'm open to adapting the
process (eg: switch to one mail for -rc and one for release like Adrian
does with 2.6.16).

The rolled up patch can be found here :
ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/stable-review/patch-2.6.20.16-rc1.gz

Responses should be made by August 13, 2007, 20:00:00 UTC. Anything
received after that time might be too late.

Thanks,
Willy

--


2007-08-12 16:56:44

by Andreas Radke

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [2.6.20.16 review 00/28] 2.6.20.16 -stable review

Am Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:00:15 +0200
schrieb Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>:

> My goal is *not* to do all the hard work they do, but just to backport
> from their patches those which are meaningful for 2.6.20. For this
> reason, 2.6.20 releases will always be slightly late and should not
> contain patches not merged in more recent releases.
>
> My intent with this version is to catch up with 2.6.21.7. Other
> patches are already pending for future releases, but one thing at a
> time. I'm trying to follow the same review/release process, so 28
> patches will be posted for review in response to this message.

hm. i'm a bit confused about your intention.

will you keep maintaining 2.6.20.x for longer? should this one replace
or live along the 2.6.16.xx long life series?

Andreas Radke
ArchLinux x86_64 developer/maintainer