2023-09-18 11:04:19

by Vadim Fedorenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: dpll: Fix code blocks

On 18/09/2023 10:32, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> kernel test robot and Stephen Rothwell report htmldocs warnings:
>
> Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst:427: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 18 supplied.
>
> .. code-block:: c
> <snipped>...
> Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst:444: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 21 supplied.
>
> .. code-block:: c
> <snipped>...
> Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst:474: WARNING: Error in "code-block" directive:
> maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 12 supplied.
>
> .. code-block:: c
> <snipped>...
>
> Fix these above by adding missing blank line separator after code-block
> directive.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/[email protected]/
> Fixes: dbb291f19393b6 ("dpll: documentation on DPLL subsystem interface")
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <[email protected]>

> ---
> Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
> index bb52f1b8c0be31..01eb4de867036f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dpll.rst
> @@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ The simplest implementation is in the OCP TimeCard driver. The ops
> structures are defined like this:
>
> .. code-block:: c
> +
> static const struct dpll_device_ops dpll_ops = {
> .lock_status_get = ptp_ocp_dpll_lock_status_get,
> .mode_get = ptp_ocp_dpll_mode_get,
> @@ -442,6 +443,7 @@ structures are defined like this:
> The registration part is then looks like this part:
>
> .. code-block:: c
> +
> clkid = pci_get_dsn(pdev);
> bp->dpll = dpll_device_get(clkid, 0, THIS_MODULE);
> if (IS_ERR(bp->dpll)) {
> @@ -472,6 +474,7 @@ The registration part is then looks like this part:
> In the error path we have to rewind every allocation in the reverse order:
>
> .. code-block:: c
> +
> while (i) {
> --i;
> dpll_pin_unregister(bp->dpll, bp->sma[i].dpll_pin, &dpll_pins_ops, &bp->sma[i]);