2023-11-06 10:37:37

by Jerome Brunet

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: fix clock get name

The name currently used to get the clock includes the dapm prefix.
It should use the name as provided to the widget, without the prefix.

Fixes: 3caac759681e ("ASoC: soc-dapm.c: fixup snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked() error handling")
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
index 4e2beda6f9bf..3844f777c87b 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
@@ -3670,7 +3670,7 @@ snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
dapm_pinctrl_event(w, NULL, SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMD);
break;
case snd_soc_dapm_clock_supply:
- w->clk = devm_clk_get(dapm->dev, w->name);
+ w->clk = devm_clk_get(dapm->dev, widget->name);
if (IS_ERR(w->clk)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(w->clk);
goto request_failed;
--
2.42.0


2023-11-06 13:04:03

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dapm: fix clock get name

On Mon, 06 Nov 2023 11:37:09 +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> The name currently used to get the clock includes the dapm prefix.
> It should use the name as provided to the widget, without the prefix.
>
>

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: dapm: fix clock get name
commit: 4bdcbc31ad2112385ad525b28972c45015e6ad70

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark