2024-04-10 00:33:25

by Edward Adam Davis

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: strnchr not suitable for getting NUL-terminator

The strnchr() is not suitable for obtaining the end of a string with a length
exceeding 1 and ending with a NUL character.

Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <[email protected]>
---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 449b9a5d3fe3..07490eba24fe 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ int bpf_bprintf_prepare(char *fmt, u32 fmt_size, const u64 *raw_args,
u64 cur_arg;
char fmt_ptype, cur_ip[16], ip_spec[] = "%pXX";

- fmt_end = strnchr(fmt, fmt_size, 0);
+ fmt_end = strnchrnul(fmt, fmt_size, 0);
if (!fmt_end)
return -EINVAL;
fmt_size = fmt_end - fmt;
--
2.43.0



2024-04-10 15:10:10

by Yonghong Song

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: strnchr not suitable for getting NUL-terminator


On 4/9/24 5:33 PM, Edward Adam Davis wrote:
> The strnchr() is not suitable for obtaining the end of a string with a length
> exceeding 1 and ending with a NUL character.

Could you give more detailed explanation with specific examples? I think
strnchr() does the right thing here. Note that if fmt is not NULL,
strnchrnul() never returns NULL pointer so in the change below,
'if (!fmt_end)' will be always false.

>
> Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <[email protected]>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> index 449b9a5d3fe3..07490eba24fe 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> @@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ int bpf_bprintf_prepare(char *fmt, u32 fmt_size, const u64 *raw_args,
> u64 cur_arg;
> char fmt_ptype, cur_ip[16], ip_spec[] = "%pXX";
>
> - fmt_end = strnchr(fmt, fmt_size, 0);
> + fmt_end = strnchrnul(fmt, fmt_size, 0);
> if (!fmt_end)
> return -EINVAL;
> fmt_size = fmt_end - fmt;

2024-04-11 11:11:16

by Edward Adam Davis

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: strnchr not suitable for getting NUL-terminator

> > The strnchr() is not suitable for obtaining the end of a string with a length
> > exceeding 1 and ending with a NUL character.
>
> Could you give more detailed explanation with specific examples? I think
> strnchr() does the right thing here. Note that if fmt is not NULL,
> strnchrnul() never returns NULL pointer so in the change below,
> 'if (!fmt_end)' will be always false.
My mistake, strnchr() work well.
>
> >