Replace a wrong EXPECT_GT(self->child_pid_exited, 0) with EXPECT_GE(),
which will be actually tested on the parent and child sides with a
following commit.
Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
---
Changes since v1:
* Extract change from a bigger patch (suggested by Kees).
---
tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_setns_test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_setns_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_setns_test.c
index 6e2f2cd400ca..47746b0c6acd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_setns_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/pidfd_setns_test.c
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ FIXTURE_SETUP(current_nsset)
/* Create task that exits right away. */
self->child_pid_exited = create_child(&self->child_pidfd_exited,
CLONE_NEWUSER | CLONE_NEWNET);
- EXPECT_GT(self->child_pid_exited, 0);
+ EXPECT_GE(self->child_pid_exited, 0);
if (self->child_pid_exited == 0)
_exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
--
2.44.0
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 03:09:29PM +0200, Micka?l Sala?n wrote:
> Replace a wrong EXPECT_GT(self->child_pid_exited, 0) with EXPECT_GE(),
> which will be actually tested on the parent and child sides with a
> following commit.
>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> Cc: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Micka?l Sala?n <[email protected]>
I had to take a closer look at this one -- but yes, this should be just
checking for failure (negative). The parent/child separation is
afterwards.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
--
Kees Cook