There are multiple assertion formatting functions in the `assert.c`
file, which are not covered with tests yet. Implement the KUnit test
for these functions.
The test consists of 11 test cases for the following functions:
1) 'is_literal'
2) 'is_str_literal'
3) 'kunit_assert_prologue', test case for multiple assert types
4) 'kunit_assert_print_msg'
5) 'kunit_unary_assert_format'
6) 'kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format'
7) 'kunit_binary_assert_format'
8) 'kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format'
9) 'kunit_binary_str_assert_format'
10) 'kunit_assert_hexdump'
11) 'kunit_mem_assert_format'
The test aims at maximizing the branch coverage for the assertion
formatting functions.
As you can see, it covers some of the static helper functions as
well, so mark the static functions in `assert.c` as 'VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT'
and conditionally export them with EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT. Add the
corresponding definitions to `assert.h`.
Build the assert test when CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is enabled, similar to
how it is done for the string stream test.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <[email protected]>
---
V1 -> V2:
- Check the output from the string stream for containing the key parts
instead of comparing the results with expected strings char by char, as
it was suggested by Rae Moar <[email protected]>. Define two macros to
make it possible (ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_CONTAIN and
ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_NCONTAIN).
- Mark the static functions in `assert.c` as VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT and export
them conditionally if kunit is enabled instead of including the
`assert_test.c` file in the end of `assert.c`. This way we will decouple
the test from the implementation (SUT).
- Update the kunit_assert_hexdump test: now it checks for presense of
the brackets '<>' around the non-matching bytes, instead of comparing
the kunit_assert_hexdump output char by char.
V2 -> V3:
- Make test case array and test suite definitions static
- Change the condition in `assert.h`: we should declare VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
functions in the header file when CONFIG_KUNIT is enabled, not
CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST. Otherwise, if CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is disabled,
VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT functions in the `assert.c` are not static, and
prototypes for them can't be found.
- Add MODULE_LICENSE and MODULE_DESCRIPTION macros
V3 -> V4:
- Compile the assertion test only when CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is set to 'y',
as it is done for the string-stream test. It is necessary since
functions from the string-stream are not exported into the public
namespace, and therefore they are not accessible when linking and
loading the test module.
V4 -> V5:
- Remove EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT from the assert.c and all of the
module-related macros from the test source since the test can't
be used as a loadable module for now (see V3 -> V4).
include/kunit/assert.h | 11 ++
lib/kunit/Makefile | 1 +
lib/kunit/assert.c | 19 +-
lib/kunit/assert_test.c | 388 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 411 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 lib/kunit/assert_test.c
diff --git a/include/kunit/assert.h b/include/kunit/assert.h
index 24c2b9fa61e8..7e7490a74b13 100644
--- a/include/kunit/assert.h
+++ b/include/kunit/assert.h
@@ -218,4 +218,15 @@ void kunit_mem_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
const struct va_format *message,
struct string_stream *stream);
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT)
+void kunit_assert_print_msg(const struct va_format *message,
+ struct string_stream *stream);
+bool is_literal(const char *text, long long value);
+bool is_str_literal(const char *text, const char *value);
+void kunit_assert_hexdump(struct string_stream *stream,
+ const void *buf,
+ const void *compared_buf,
+ const size_t len);
+#endif
+
#endif /* _KUNIT_ASSERT_H */
diff --git a/lib/kunit/Makefile b/lib/kunit/Makefile
index 309659a32a78..900e6447c8e8 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/Makefile
+++ b/lib/kunit/Makefile
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += kunit-test.o
# string-stream-test compiles built-in only.
ifeq ($(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST),y)
obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += string-stream-test.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += assert_test.o
endif
obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST) += kunit-example-test.o
diff --git a/lib/kunit/assert.c b/lib/kunit/assert.c
index dd1d633d0fe2..867aa5c4bccf 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/assert.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/assert.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
*/
#include <kunit/assert.h>
#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <kunit/visibility.h>
#include "string-stream.h"
@@ -30,8 +31,9 @@ void kunit_assert_prologue(const struct kunit_loc *loc,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_assert_prologue);
-static void kunit_assert_print_msg(const struct va_format *message,
- struct string_stream *stream)
+VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
+void kunit_assert_print_msg(const struct va_format *message,
+ struct string_stream *stream)
{
if (message->fmt)
string_stream_add(stream, "\n%pV", message);
@@ -89,7 +91,7 @@ void kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format);
/* Checks if `text` is a literal representing `value`, e.g. "5" and 5 */
-static bool is_literal(const char *text, long long value)
+VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT bool is_literal(const char *text, long long value)
{
char *buffer;
int len;
@@ -166,7 +168,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format);
/* Checks if KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() args were string literals.
* Note: `text` will have ""s where as `value` will not.
*/
-static bool is_str_literal(const char *text, const char *value)
+VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT bool is_str_literal(const char *text, const char *value)
{
int len;
@@ -208,10 +210,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_str_assert_format);
/* Adds a hexdump of a buffer to a string_stream comparing it with
* a second buffer. The different bytes are marked with <>.
*/
-static void kunit_assert_hexdump(struct string_stream *stream,
- const void *buf,
- const void *compared_buf,
- const size_t len)
+VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT
+void kunit_assert_hexdump(struct string_stream *stream,
+ const void *buf,
+ const void *compared_buf,
+ const size_t len)
{
size_t i;
const u8 *buf1 = buf;
diff --git a/lib/kunit/assert_test.c b/lib/kunit/assert_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4a5967712186
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/kunit/assert_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,388 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * KUnit test for the assertion formatting functions.
+ * Author: Ivan Orlov <[email protected]>
+ */
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include "string-stream.h"
+
+#define TEST_PTR_EXPECTED_BUF_SIZE 32
+#define HEXDUMP_TEST_BUF_LEN 5
+#define ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_CONTAIN(test, str, substr) KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, strstr(str, substr))
+#define ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_NCONTAIN(test, str, substr) KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, strstr(str, substr))
+
+static void kunit_test_is_literal(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_literal("5", 5));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_literal("0", 0));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_literal("1234567890", 1234567890));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_literal("-1234567890", -1234567890));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_literal("05", 5));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_literal("", 0));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_literal("-0", 0));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_literal("12#45", 1245));
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_is_str_literal(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_str_literal("\"Hello, World!\"", "Hello, World!"));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_str_literal("\"\"", ""));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, is_str_literal("\"\"\"", "\""));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("", ""));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("\"", "\""));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("\"Abacaba", "Abacaba"));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("Abacaba\"", "Abacaba"));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, is_str_literal("\"Abacaba\"", "\"Abacaba\""));
+}
+
+KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER(kfree_wrapper, kfree, const void *);
+
+/* this function is used to get a "char *" string from the string stream and defer its cleanup */
+static char *get_str_from_stream(struct kunit *test, struct string_stream *stream)
+{
+ char *str = string_stream_get_string(stream);
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, str);
+ kunit_add_action(test, kfree_wrapper, (void *)str);
+
+ return str;
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_assert_prologue(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct string_stream *stream;
+ char *str;
+ const struct kunit_loc location = {
+ .file = "testfile.c",
+ .line = 1337,
+ };
+
+ stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream);
+
+ /* Test an expectation fail prologue */
+ kunit_assert_prologue(&location, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, stream);
+ str = get_str_from_stream(test, stream);
+ ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_CONTAIN(test, str, "EXPECTATION");
+ ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_CONTAIN(test, str, "testfile.c");
+ ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_CONTAIN(test, str, "1337");
+
+ /* Test an assertion fail prologue */
+ string_stream_clear(stream);
+ kunit_assert_prologue(&location, KUNIT_ASSERTION, stream);
+ str = get_str_from_stream(test, stream);
+ ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_CONTAIN(test, str, "ASSERTION");
+ ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_CONTAIN(test, str, "testfile.c");
+ ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_CONTAIN(test, str, "1337");
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function accepts an arbitrary count of parameters and generates a va_format struct,
+ * which can be used to validate kunit_assert_print_msg function
+ */
+static void verify_assert_print_msg(struct kunit *test,
+ struct string_stream *stream,
+ char *expected, const char *format, ...)
+{
+ va_list list;
+ const struct va_format vformat = {
+ .fmt = format,
+ .va = &list,
+ };
+
+ va_start(list, format);
+ string_stream_clear(stream);
+ kunit_assert_print_msg(&vformat, stream);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, get_str_from_stream(test, stream), expected);
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_assert_print_msg(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct string_stream *stream;
+
+ stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream);
+
+ verify_assert_print_msg(test, stream, "\nTest", "Test");
+ verify_assert_print_msg(test, stream, "\nAbacaba -123 234", "%s %d %u",
+ "Abacaba", -123, 234U);
+ verify_assert_print_msg(test, stream, "", NULL);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Further code contains the tests for different assert format functions.
+ * This helper function accepts the assert format function, executes it and
+ * validates the result string from the stream by checking that all of the
+ * substrings exist in the output.
+ */
+static void validate_assert(assert_format_t format_func, struct kunit *test,
+ const struct kunit_assert *assert,
+ struct string_stream *stream, int num_checks, ...)
+{
+ size_t i;
+ va_list checks;
+ char *cur_substr_exp;
+ struct va_format message = { NULL, NULL };
+
+ va_start(checks, num_checks);
+ string_stream_clear(stream);
+ format_func(assert, &message, stream);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num_checks; i++) {
+ cur_substr_exp = va_arg(checks, char *);
+ ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_CONTAIN(test, get_str_from_stream(test, stream), cur_substr_exp);
+ }
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_unary_assert_format(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct string_stream *stream;
+ struct kunit_assert assert = {};
+ struct kunit_unary_assert un_assert = {
+ .assert = assert,
+ .condition = "expr",
+ .expected_true = true,
+ };
+
+ stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream);
+
+ validate_assert(kunit_unary_assert_format, test, &un_assert.assert,
+ stream, 2, "true", "is false");
+
+ un_assert.expected_true = false;
+ validate_assert(kunit_unary_assert_format, test, &un_assert.assert,
+ stream, 2, "false", "is true");
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_ptr_not_err_assert_format(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct string_stream *stream;
+ struct kunit_assert assert = {};
+ struct kunit_ptr_not_err_assert not_err_assert = {
+ .assert = assert,
+ .text = "expr",
+ .value = NULL,
+ };
+
+ stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream);
+
+ /* Value is NULL. The corresponding message should be printed out */
+ validate_assert(kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format, test,
+ ¬_err_assert.assert,
+ stream, 1, "null");
+
+ /* Value is not NULL, but looks like an error pointer. Error should be printed out */
+ not_err_assert.value = (void *)-12;
+ validate_assert(kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format, test,
+ ¬_err_assert.assert, stream, 2,
+ "error", "-12");
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_binary_assert_format(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct string_stream *stream;
+ struct kunit_assert assert = {};
+ struct kunit_binary_assert_text text = {
+ .left_text = "1 + 2",
+ .operation = "==",
+ .right_text = "2",
+ };
+ const struct kunit_binary_assert binary_assert = {
+ .assert = assert,
+ .text = &text,
+ .left_value = 3,
+ .right_value = 2,
+ };
+
+ stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream);
+
+ /*
+ * Printed values should depend on the input we provide: the left text, right text, left
+ * value and the right value.
+ */
+ validate_assert(kunit_binary_assert_format, test, &binary_assert.assert,
+ stream, 4, "1 + 2", "2", "3", "==");
+
+ text.right_text = "4 - 2";
+ validate_assert(kunit_binary_assert_format, test, &binary_assert.assert,
+ stream, 3, "==", "1 + 2", "4 - 2");
+
+ text.left_text = "3";
+ validate_assert(kunit_binary_assert_format, test, &binary_assert.assert,
+ stream, 4, "3", "4 - 2", "2", "==");
+
+ text.right_text = "2";
+ validate_assert(kunit_binary_assert_format, test, &binary_assert.assert,
+ stream, 3, "3", "2", "==");
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_binary_ptr_assert_format(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct string_stream *stream;
+ struct kunit_assert assert = {};
+ char *addr_var_a, *addr_var_b;
+ static const void *var_a = (void *)0xDEADBEEF;
+ static const void *var_b = (void *)0xBADDCAFE;
+ struct kunit_binary_assert_text text = {
+ .left_text = "var_a",
+ .operation = "==",
+ .right_text = "var_b",
+ };
+ struct kunit_binary_ptr_assert binary_ptr_assert = {
+ .assert = assert,
+ .text = &text,
+ .left_value = var_a,
+ .right_value = var_b,
+ };
+
+ addr_var_a = kunit_kzalloc(test, TEST_PTR_EXPECTED_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, addr_var_a);
+ addr_var_b = kunit_kzalloc(test, TEST_PTR_EXPECTED_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, addr_var_b);
+ /*
+ * Print the addresses to the buffers first.
+ * This is necessary as we may have different count of leading zeros in the pointer
+ * on different architectures.
+ */
+ snprintf(addr_var_a, TEST_PTR_EXPECTED_BUF_SIZE, "%px", var_a);
+ snprintf(addr_var_b, TEST_PTR_EXPECTED_BUF_SIZE, "%px", var_b);
+
+ stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream);
+ validate_assert(kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format, test, &binary_ptr_assert.assert,
+ stream, 3, addr_var_a, addr_var_b, "==");
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_binary_str_assert_format(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct string_stream *stream;
+ struct kunit_assert assert = {};
+ static const char *var_a = "abacaba";
+ static const char *var_b = "kernel";
+ struct kunit_binary_assert_text text = {
+ .left_text = "var_a",
+ .operation = "==",
+ .right_text = "var_b",
+ };
+ struct kunit_binary_str_assert binary_str_assert = {
+ .assert = assert,
+ .text = &text,
+ .left_value = var_a,
+ .right_value = var_b,
+ };
+
+ stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream);
+
+ validate_assert(kunit_binary_str_assert_format, test,
+ &binary_str_assert.assert,
+ stream, 5, "var_a", "var_b", "\"abacaba\"",
+ "\"kernel\"", "==");
+
+ text.left_text = "\"abacaba\"";
+ validate_assert(kunit_binary_str_assert_format, test, &binary_str_assert.assert,
+ stream, 4, "\"abacaba\"", "var_b", "\"kernel\"", "==");
+
+ text.right_text = "\"kernel\"";
+ validate_assert(kunit_binary_str_assert_format, test, &binary_str_assert.assert,
+ stream, 3, "\"abacaba\"", "\"kernel\"", "==");
+}
+
+static const u8 hex_testbuf1[] = { 0x26, 0x74, 0x6b, 0x9c, 0x55,
+ 0x45, 0x9d, 0x47, 0xd6, 0x47,
+ 0x2, 0x89, 0x8c, 0x81, 0x94,
+ 0x12, 0xfe, 0x01 };
+static const u8 hex_testbuf2[] = { 0x26, 0x74, 0x6b, 0x9c, 0x55,
+ 0x45, 0x9d, 0x47, 0x21, 0x47,
+ 0xcd, 0x89, 0x24, 0x50, 0x94,
+ 0x12, 0xba, 0x01 };
+static void kunit_test_assert_hexdump(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct string_stream *stream;
+ char *str;
+ size_t i;
+ char buf[HEXDUMP_TEST_BUF_LEN];
+
+ stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream);
+ /* Check that we are getting output like <xx> for non-matching numbers. */
+ kunit_assert_hexdump(stream, hex_testbuf1, hex_testbuf2, sizeof(hex_testbuf1));
+ str = get_str_from_stream(test, stream);
+ for (i = 0; i < sizeof(hex_testbuf1); i++) {
+ snprintf(buf, HEXDUMP_TEST_BUF_LEN, "<%02x>", hex_testbuf1[i]);
+ if (hex_testbuf1[i] != hex_testbuf2[i])
+ ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_CONTAIN(test, str, buf);
+ }
+ /* We shouldn't get any <xx> numbers when comparing the buffer with itself. */
+ string_stream_clear(stream);
+ kunit_assert_hexdump(stream, hex_testbuf1, hex_testbuf1, sizeof(hex_testbuf1));
+ str = get_str_from_stream(test, stream);
+ ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_NCONTAIN(test, str, "<");
+ ASSERT_TEST_EXPECT_NCONTAIN(test, str, ">");
+}
+
+static void kunit_test_mem_assert_format(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct string_stream *stream;
+ struct string_stream *expected_stream;
+ struct kunit_assert assert = {};
+ static const struct kunit_binary_assert_text text = {
+ .left_text = "hex_testbuf1",
+ .operation = "==",
+ .right_text = "hex_testbuf2",
+ };
+ struct kunit_mem_assert mem_assert = {
+ .assert = assert,
+ .text = &text,
+ .left_value = NULL,
+ .right_value = hex_testbuf2,
+ .size = sizeof(hex_testbuf1),
+ };
+
+ expected_stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, expected_stream);
+ stream = kunit_alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, stream);
+
+ /* The left value is NULL */
+ validate_assert(kunit_mem_assert_format, test, &mem_assert.assert,
+ stream, 2, "hex_testbuf1", "is not null");
+
+ /* The right value is NULL, the left value is not NULL */
+ mem_assert.left_value = hex_testbuf1;
+ mem_assert.right_value = NULL;
+ validate_assert(kunit_mem_assert_format, test, &mem_assert.assert,
+ stream, 2, "hex_testbuf2", "is not null");
+
+ /* Both arguments are not null */
+ mem_assert.left_value = hex_testbuf1;
+ mem_assert.right_value = hex_testbuf2;
+
+ validate_assert(kunit_mem_assert_format, test, &mem_assert.assert,
+ stream, 3, "hex_testbuf1", "hex_testbuf2", "==");
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case assert_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_is_literal),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_is_str_literal),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_assert_prologue),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_assert_print_msg),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_unary_assert_format),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_ptr_not_err_assert_format),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_binary_assert_format),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_binary_ptr_assert_format),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_binary_str_assert_format),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_assert_hexdump),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_mem_assert_format),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite assert_test_suite = {
+ .name = "kunit-assert",
+ .test_cases = assert_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(&assert_test_suite);
--
2.34.1
On 5/20/24 22:12, Rae Moar wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:17 PM Ivan Orlov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> There are multiple assertion formatting functions in the `assert.c`
>> file, which are not covered with tests yet. Implement the KUnit test
>> for these functions.
>>
>> The test consists of 11 test cases for the following functions:
>>
>> 1) 'is_literal'
>> 2) 'is_str_literal'
>> 3) 'kunit_assert_prologue', test case for multiple assert types
>> 4) 'kunit_assert_print_msg'
>> 5) 'kunit_unary_assert_format'
>> 6) 'kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format'
>> 7) 'kunit_binary_assert_format'
>> 8) 'kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format'
>> 9) 'kunit_binary_str_assert_format'
>> 10) 'kunit_assert_hexdump'
>> 11) 'kunit_mem_assert_format'
>>
>> The test aims at maximizing the branch coverage for the assertion
>> formatting functions.
>>
>> As you can see, it covers some of the static helper functions as
>> well, so mark the static functions in `assert.c` as 'VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT'
>> and conditionally export them with EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT. Add the
>> corresponding definitions to `assert.h`.
>>
>> Build the assert test when CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is enabled, similar to
>> how it is done for the string stream test.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <[email protected]>
>
> Hi! This looks great to me!
>
> Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <[email protected]>
>
Hi Rae,
Thank you so much for the review and sorry for the late reply :)
--
Kind regards,
Ivan Orlov
On Fri, 17 May 2024 at 05:17, Ivan Orlov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There are multiple assertion formatting functions in the `assert.c`
> file, which are not covered with tests yet. Implement the KUnit test
> for these functions.
>
> The test consists of 11 test cases for the following functions:
>
> 1) 'is_literal'
> 2) 'is_str_literal'
> 3) 'kunit_assert_prologue', test case for multiple assert types
> 4) 'kunit_assert_print_msg'
> 5) 'kunit_unary_assert_format'
> 6) 'kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format'
> 7) 'kunit_binary_assert_format'
> 8) 'kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format'
> 9) 'kunit_binary_str_assert_format'
> 10) 'kunit_assert_hexdump'
> 11) 'kunit_mem_assert_format'
>
> The test aims at maximizing the branch coverage for the assertion
> formatting functions.
>
> As you can see, it covers some of the static helper functions as
> well, so mark the static functions in `assert.c` as 'VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT'
> and conditionally export them with EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT. Add the
> corresponding definitions to `assert.h`.
>
> Build the assert test when CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is enabled, similar to
> how it is done for the string stream test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Orlov <[email protected]>
> ---
This looks good to me, and passes all of my tests locally.
Note that this does have some checkpatch warnings:
WARNING: Using vsprintf specifier '%px' potentially exposes the kernel
memory layout, if you don't really need the address please consider
using '%p'.
#426: FILE: lib/kunit/assert_test.c:250:
+ snprintf(addr_var_a, TEST_PTR_EXPECTED_BUF_SIZE, "%px", var_a);
WARNING: Using vsprintf specifier '%px' potentially exposes the kernel
memory layout, if you don't really need the address please consider
using '%p'.
#427: FILE: lib/kunit/assert_test.c:251:
+ snprintf(addr_var_b, TEST_PTR_EXPECTED_BUF_SIZE, "%px", var_b);
These are necessary, as KUnit _does_ expose the kernel memory layout
(on purpose), as it's useful for debugging. This is one of the reasons
why KUnit tests taint the kernel: to make it clear that this could be
a problem.
Acked-by: David Gow <[email protected]>
Cheers,
-- David