2008-02-01 20:32:44

by Marcin Ślusarz

Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix cpu info in dmesg

I'm not sure whether it's the right fix, but it doesn't make sense to call
print_cpu_info without leading printk...
---
fix print_cpu_info, because it produced on boot:
CPU: <6>AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ stepping 00
instead of
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ stepping 00

(broken since 04e1ba852132c9ad006affcd5b8c8606295170b0 -
x86: cleanup kernel/setup_64.c)

Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
index 77fb87b..f3b30b9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
@@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@ __setup("noclflush", setup_noclflush);
void __cpuinit print_cpu_info(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
if (c->x86_model_id[0])
- printk(KERN_INFO "%s", c->x86_model_id);
+ printk(KERN_CONT "%s", c->x86_model_id);

if (c->x86_mask || c->cpuid_level >= 0)
printk(KERN_CONT " stepping %02x\n", c->x86_mask);
--
1.5.3.7

2008-02-17 16:16:30

by Ingo Molnar

Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix cpu info in dmesg

* Marcin Slusarz <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not sure whether it's the right fix, but it doesn't make sense to call
> print_cpu_info without leading printk...

thanks, applied.

Ingo