2024-06-13 00:49:22

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

Hi all,

The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
commits (but the same patch):

08ce6f724ce9 ("proc: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")

This is commit

d92c9986e4db ("proc: remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")

in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2024-06-13 00:51:46

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

Hi all,

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:48:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I meant the mm tree, obviously.

> commits (but the same patch):
>
> 08ce6f724ce9 ("proc: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
>
> This is commit
>
> d92c9986e4db ("proc: remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
>
> in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2024-06-13 02:21:52

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:48:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
> commits (but the same patch):
>
> 08ce6f724ce9 ("proc: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
>
> This is commit
>
> d92c9986e4db ("proc: remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
>
> in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree.

That's one patch from a three-patch series in a different tree.

Also,

hp2:/usr/src/mm> git log fs/proc/ | grep "Signed-off-by.*brauner" | wc -l
22
hp2:/usr/src/mm> git log fs/proc/ | grep "Signed-off-by.*akpm" | wc -l
1211

Christian, if procfs patches are to henceforth go via the vfs tree,
let's be a bit more organized about it?


2024-06-13 12:44:27

by Christian Brauner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 07:21:41PM GMT, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:48:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
> > commits (but the same patch):
> >
> > 08ce6f724ce9 ("proc: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
> >
> > This is commit
> >
> > d92c9986e4db ("proc: remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
> >
> > in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree.
>
> That's one patch from a three-patch series in a different tree.
>
> Also,
>
> hp2:/usr/src/mm> git log fs/proc/ | grep "Signed-off-by.*brauner" | wc -l
> 22
> hp2:/usr/src/mm> git log fs/proc/ | grep "Signed-off-by.*akpm" | wc -l
> 1211
>
> Christian, if procfs patches are to henceforth go via the vfs tree,
> let's be a bit more organized about it?

Sure. I simply didn't see any any "applied" message from you so I just
assumed to pick the parts that are relevant. Sorry about that.

2024-06-13 19:43:16

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:17:01 +0200 Christian Brauner <[email protected]> wrote:

> >
> > Christian, if procfs patches are to henceforth go via the vfs tree,
> > let's be a bit more organized about it?
>
> Sure. I simply didn't see any any "applied" message from you so I just
> assumed to pick the parts that are relevant. Sorry about that.

No probs. If the author didn't cc you then my remember-to-cc-christian
brain cell is unreliable :(

It'll be at https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/ but that's a hassle.


2024-06-13 20:39:33

by Christophe JAILLET

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the vfs-brauner tree


Le 13/06/2024 à 21:43, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:17:01 +0200 Christian Brauner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> Christian, if procfs patches are to henceforth go via the vfs tree,
>>> let's be a bit more organized about it?
>> Sure. I simply didn't see any any "applied" message from you so I just
>> assumed to pick the parts that are relevant. Sorry about that.
> No probs. If the author didn't cc you then my remember-to-cc-christian
> brain cell is unreliable :(

I guess, that the author is me.

in my .gitconfig, I use

[sendemail.linux]
    tocmd ="`pwd`/scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback
--norolestats --nol"
    cccmd ="`pwd`/scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback
--norolestats --nom"

and

>scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats --nol
fs/proc/generic.c
[EMPTY OUTPUT]

>scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats --nol
fs/proc/generic.c
[email protected]
[email protected]


Should MAINTAINERS be updated somewhere?


(sorry for the mess I've generated :( )


CJ


>
> It'll be at https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/ but that's a hassle.
>