Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: a957267fa7e9 Add linux-next specific files for 20240611
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16aea4ee980000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=9a880e96898e79f8
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d7452fc408a961bcc6ec
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/6451759a606b/disk-a957267f.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7f635dbe5b8a/vmlinux-a957267f.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/33eafd1b8aec/bzImage-a957267f.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: [email protected]
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.10.0-rc3-next-20240611-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.1/11846 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88807bdfba98 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mmap_read_lock_killable+0x1d/0x70 include/linux/mmap_lock.h:153
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888077e4d460 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_trylock include/linux/fs.h:815 [inline]
ffff888077e4d460 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ntfs_file_write_iter+0x25a/0x770 fs/ntfs3/file.c:1099
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5817
down_write+0x3a/0x50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1579
inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:795 [inline]
ntfs_file_mmap+0x5d8/0x860 fs/ntfs3/file.c:302
call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:2123 [inline]
mmap_region+0xe8f/0x2090 mm/mmap.c:2927
do_mmap+0x8ad/0xfa0 mm/mmap.c:1438
vm_mmap_pgoff+0x1dd/0x3d0 mm/util.c:573
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x4f1/0x720 mm/mmap.c:1484
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3159 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3278 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3902
__lock_acquire+0x1359/0x2000 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5194
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5817
down_read_killable+0xca/0xd30 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1549
mmap_read_lock_killable+0x1d/0x70 include/linux/mmap_lock.h:153
get_mmap_lock_carefully mm/memory.c:5846 [inline]
lock_mm_and_find_vma+0x29c/0x2f0 mm/memory.c:5897
do_user_addr_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1361 [inline]
handle_page_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1481 [inline]
exc_page_fault+0x1bf/0x8c0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1539
asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:623
fault_in_readable+0x108/0x2b0 mm/gup.c:2382
fault_in_iov_iter_readable+0x229/0x280 lib/iov_iter.c:94
generic_perform_write+0x492/0x640 mm/filemap.c:4006
ntfs_file_write_iter+0x68f/0x770 fs/ntfs3/file.c:1126
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]
vfs_write+0xa72/0xc90 fs/read_write.c:590
ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:643
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26);
rlock(&mm->mmap_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by syz-executor.1/11846:
#0: ffff88801d356fc8 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x24e/0x310 fs/file.c:1191
#1: ffff88801f5e0420 (sb_writers#18){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: file_start_write include/linux/fs.h:2870 [inline]
#1: ffff88801f5e0420 (sb_writers#18){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x227/0xc90 fs/read_write.c:586
#2: ffff888077e4d460 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_trylock include/linux/fs.h:815 [inline]
#2: ffff888077e4d460 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#26){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ntfs_file_write_iter+0x25a/0x770 fs/ntfs3/file.c:1099
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 11846 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc3-next-20240611-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:91 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:117
print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2075
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2204
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3159 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3278 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3902
__lock_acquire+0x1359/0x2000 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5194
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5817
down_read_killable+0xca/0xd30 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1549
mmap_read_lock_killable+0x1d/0x70 include/linux/mmap_lock.h:153
get_mmap_lock_carefully mm/memory.c:5846 [inline]
lock_mm_and_find_vma+0x29c/0x2f0 mm/memory.c:5897
do_user_addr_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1361 [inline]
handle_page_fault arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1481 [inline]
exc_page_fault+0x1bf/0x8c0 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1539
asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:623
RIP: 0010:fault_in_readable+0x108/0x2b0 mm/gup.c:2383
Code: 00 00 00 0f 01 cb 0f ae e8 48 89 de 48 81 e6 ff 0f 00 00 31 ff e8 a8 56 b5 ff 48 89 d8 48 25 ff 0f 00 00 4c 89 74 24 18 74 30 <8a> 1b e8 b1 51 b5 ff 43 0f b6 04 2f 84 c0 0f 85 4d 01 00 00 88 5c
RSP: 0018:ffffc900035df9e0 EFLAGS: 00050202
RAX: 0000000000000240 RBX: 0000000020081240 RCX: ffff8880760d9e00
RDX: ffffc9000a56f000 RSI: 0000000000000240 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffffc900035dfa98 R08: ffffffff81ddf628 R09: ffffffff84ac0ea9
R10: 0000000000000002 R11: ffff8880760d9e00 R12: 0000000000001000
R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 1ffff920006bbf40 R15: 1ffff920006bbf44
fault_in_iov_iter_readable+0x229/0x280 lib/iov_iter.c:94
generic_perform_write+0x492/0x640 mm/filemap.c:4006
ntfs_file_write_iter+0x68f/0x770 fs/ntfs3/file.c:1126
new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]
vfs_write+0xa72/0xc90 fs/read_write.c:590
ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:643
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f9a82c7cf69
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f9a839f60c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f9a82db4050 RCX: 00007f9a82c7cf69
RDX: 000000000208e24b RSI: 0000000020000240 RDI: 0000000000000009
RBP: 00007f9a82cda6fe R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000006e R14: 00007f9a82db4050 R15: 00007ffef2c2b4c8
</TASK>
----------------
Code disassembly (best guess):
0: 00 00 add %al,(%rax)
2: 00 0f add %cl,(%rdi)
4: 01 cb add %ecx,%ebx
6: 0f ae e8 lfence
9: 48 89 de mov %rbx,%rsi
c: 48 81 e6 ff 0f 00 00 and $0xfff,%rsi
13: 31 ff xor %edi,%edi
15: e8 a8 56 b5 ff call 0xffb556c2
1a: 48 89 d8 mov %rbx,%rax
1d: 48 25 ff 0f 00 00 and $0xfff,%rax
23: 4c 89 74 24 18 mov %r14,0x18(%rsp)
28: 74 30 je 0x5a
* 2a: 8a 1b mov (%rbx),%bl <-- trapping instruction
2c: e8 b1 51 b5 ff call 0xffb551e2
31: 43 0f b6 04 2f movzbl (%r15,%r13,1),%eax
36: 84 c0 test %al,%al
38: 0f 85 4d 01 00 00 jne 0x18b
3e: 88 .byte 0x88
3f: 5c pop %rsp
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at [email protected].
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup