The OProfile git tree is now up-to-date:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rric/oprofile.git
Currently there are these branches:
Test branches (non fast-forward):
master all patches
next patches for next kernel
Feature branches (patches not yet ready for upstream, fast-forward only):
arch-perfmon
multiplexing
Upstream branches (patches for the architcture maintainers and
linux-next, fast-forward only):
x86-oprofile-for-tip
oprofile-for-tip
powerpc-for-paul
Please use the master/next branches as the latest OProfile kernel for
testing.
Pending patches are:
powerpc-for-paul:
Carl Love (1):
powerpc/cell/oprofile: fix mutex locking for spu-oprofile
Roel Kluin (1):
powerpc/cell/oprofile: vma_map: fix test on overlay_tbl_offset
x86-oprofile-for-tip:
Andi Kleen (4):
oprofile: drop const in num counters field
oprofile: Don't report Nehalem as core_2
oprofile: Implement Intel architectural perfmon support
oprofile: discover counters for op ppro too
Thanks,
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: [email protected]
Robert Richter <[email protected]> writes:
>
> Feature branches (patches not yet ready for upstream, fast-forward only):
>
> arch-perfmon
What do you mean with that? arch-perfmon is definitely ready for upstream.
-Andi
--
[email protected]
On 13.10.08 22:33:18, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Robert Richter <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> > Feature branches (patches not yet ready for upstream, fast-forward only):
> >
> > arch-perfmon
>
> What do you mean with that? arch-perfmon is definitely ready for upstream.
This contains only the patch I wrote that changes the
initialization. All other patches are already in the upstream branch.
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: [email protected]
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 03:56:45PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 13.10.08 22:33:18, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Robert Richter <[email protected]> writes:
> > >
> > > Feature branches (patches not yet ready for upstream, fast-forward only):
> > >
> > > arch-perfmon
> >
> > What do you mean with that? arch-perfmon is definitely ready for upstream.
>
> This contains only the patch I wrote that changes the
> initialization. All other patches are already in the upstream branch.
I see. Thanks. The init change is unfortunately not correct.
Doing it this way would require quite a big restructuring
to call the init functions in the right order. Probably not
worth it to avoid one function call.
-Andi