Hi,
The length of the BLOCK_IPOLL string is making it's value be printed too
far to the right. This patch fixes this and makes the output a bit
neater.
Currently:
CPU0
HI: 0
TIMER: 599792
NET_TX: 2
NET_RX: 6
BLOCK: 80807
BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0
TASKLET: 20012
SCHED: 0
HRTIMER: 63
RCU: 619279
With patch:
CPU0
HI: 0
TIMER: 585582
NET_TX: 2
NET_RX: 6
BLOCK: 80320
BLOCK_IOPOLL: 0
TASKLET: 19287
SCHED: 0
HRTIMER: 62
RCU: 604441
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>
---
fs/proc/softirqs.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/softirqs.c b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
index 1807c24..3799473 100644
--- a/fs/proc/softirqs.c
+++ b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
@@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
{
int i, j;
- seq_printf(p, " ");
+ seq_printf(p, " ");
for_each_possible_cpu(i)
seq_printf(p, "CPU%-8d", i);
seq_printf(p, "\n");
for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) {
- seq_printf(p, "%8s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
+ seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
for_each_possible_cpu(j)
seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j));
seq_printf(p, "\n");
--
1.7.0.4