This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25442
Subject : ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver
Submitter : Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Date : 2010-12-22 02:02 (8 days old)
Handled-By : Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=41252
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25442
> Subject : ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver
This FREQ has been there for years. Not that it makes it smart, and
I'll obviously send Ben's patch upstream for 2.6.38. Still processing
incoming mail queue :-(
--
Krzysztof Halasa
On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25442
> > Subject : ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver
>
> This FREQ has been there for years. Not that it makes it smart, and
> I'll obviously send Ben's patch upstream for 2.6.38. Still processing
> incoming mail queue :-(
Well, the patch is in the mainline, which is why it's still listed.
Thanks,
Rafael
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
>> This FREQ has been there for years. Not that it makes it smart, and
>> I'll obviously send Ben's patch upstream for 2.6.38. Still processing
>> incoming mail queue :-(
>
> Well, the patch is in the mainline, which is why it's still listed.
s/is/isn't/ I assume.
I was referring to the "regression" thing only, i.e. there is no any
regression here, AFAIK at least.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 15:08 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> >> This FREQ has been there for years. Not that it makes it smart, and
> >> I'll obviously send Ben's patch upstream for 2.6.38. Still processing
> >> incoming mail queue :-(
> >
> > Well, the patch is in the mainline, which is why it's still listed.
>
> s/is/isn't/ I assume.
>
> I was referring to the "regression" thing only, i.e. there is no any
> regression here, AFAIK at least.
There is a regression for the ov519 driver on ixp4xx.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.