In the following commit Daniel removed ns_cgroup
commit a77aea92010acf54ad785047234418d5d68772e2
Author: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
Date: Thu May 26 16:25:23 2011 -0700
cgroup: remove the ns_cgroup
but Daniel forgot to remove the related doc in feature-removal-schedule.txt.
This patch removes that too.
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index 1a9446b..72e2384 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@ -481,23 +481,6 @@ Who: FUJITA Tomonori <[email protected]>
----------------------------
-What: namespace cgroup (ns_cgroup)
-When: 2.6.38
-Why: The ns_cgroup leads to some problems:
- * cgroup creation is out-of-control
- * cgroup name can conflict when pids are looping
- * it is not possible to have a single process handling
- a lot of namespaces without falling in a exponential creation time
- * we may want to create a namespace without creating a cgroup
-
- The ns_cgroup is replaced by a compatibility flag 'clone_children',
- where a newly created cgroup will copy the parent cgroup values.
- The userspace has to manually create a cgroup and add a task to
- the 'tasks' file.
-Who: Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
-
-----------------------------
-
What: iwlwifi disable_hw_scan module parameters
When: 2.6.40
Why: Hareware scan is the prefer method for iwlwifi devices for
On 06/07/2011 02:06 PM, Am?rico Wang wrote:
> In the following commit Daniel removed ns_cgroup
>
> commit a77aea92010acf54ad785047234418d5d68772e2
> Author: Daniel Lezcano<[email protected]>
> Date: Thu May 26 16:25:23 2011 -0700
>
> cgroup: remove the ns_cgroup
>
> but Daniel forgot to remove the related doc in feature-removal-schedule.txt.
> This patch removes that too.
Well, I am not sure we should remove this entry from the documentation.
I let this in the doc because people may want to follow what was removed
and from what kernel version.
Looking at the doc, there are a lot of old entries.
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:19:31PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>On 06/07/2011 02:06 PM, Américo Wang wrote:
>>In the following commit Daniel removed ns_cgroup
>>
>> commit a77aea92010acf54ad785047234418d5d68772e2
>> Author: Daniel Lezcano<[email protected]>
>> Date: Thu May 26 16:25:23 2011 -0700
>>
>> cgroup: remove the ns_cgroup
>>
>>but Daniel forgot to remove the related doc in feature-removal-schedule.txt.
>>This patch removes that too.
>
>Well, I am not sure we should remove this entry from the documentation.
That is a list of features which will be removed,
not for features that was in the kernel.
>I let this in the doc because people may want to follow what was
>removed and from what kernel version.
We have changelogs or git logs, right? :)
>Looking at the doc, there are a lot of old entries.
Such as?
On 06/07/2011 02:22 PM, Américo Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:19:31PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 06/07/2011 02:06 PM, Américo Wang wrote:
>>> In the following commit Daniel removed ns_cgroup
>>>
>>> commit a77aea92010acf54ad785047234418d5d68772e2
>>> Author: Daniel Lezcano<[email protected]>
>>> Date: Thu May 26 16:25:23 2011 -0700
>>>
>>> cgroup: remove the ns_cgroup
>>>
>>> but Daniel forgot to remove the related doc in feature-removal-schedule.txt.
>>> This patch removes that too.
>> Well, I am not sure we should remove this entry from the documentation.
> That is a list of features which will be removed,
> not for features that was in the kernel.
>
>> I let this in the doc because people may want to follow what was
>> removed and from what kernel version.
> We have changelogs or git logs, right? :)
Never mind.
The introduction in the doc file is clear:
"... When the feature is removed from the kernel, it should also
be removed from this file."
Sorry I missed this when removing the ns_cgroup.
Thanks for fixing it.
-- Daniel