Hi,
yes, I think so. Do you want me to re-send the patch to some
specific address? (like trivial fixes or so...).
Thanks!
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Hans-Christian Egtvedt
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Around Sun 22 Jan 2012 15:46:33 +0100 or thereabout, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
>> Enable use of the generic atomic64 implementation on AVR32 platforms.
>> Without this the kernel fails to build as the architecture does not
>> provide its version.
>
> Thanks for the fix. I don't have an AVR32 tree currently, as I lost my access
> to kernel.org. Could it be merged in with generic fixes?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <[email protected]>
>
>> ---
>> ?arch/avr32/Kconfig | ? ?1 +
>> ?1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/avr32/Kconfig b/arch/avr32/Kconfig
>> index 197e96f..3dea7231 100644
>> --- a/arch/avr32/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/avr32/Kconfig
>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ config AVR32
>> ? ? ? select HAVE_KPROBES
>> ? ? ? select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
>> ? ? ? select GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE
>> + ? ? select GENERIC_ATOMIC64
>> ? ? ? select HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
>> ? ? ? select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
>> ? ? ? select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
> --
> mvh
> Hans-Christian Egtvedt
--
Fabio Baltieri
Around Thu 02 Feb 2012 14:13:50 +0100 or thereabout, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
Hello,
> yes, I think so. Do you want me to re-send the patch to some
> specific address? (like trivial fixes or so...).
Andrew does sometimes pick these small patches up, I would really like it to
go in as soon as possible. Try prefixing [RESEND] and add my Acked-by string.
.oO(I really need to find a kernel developer here in Oslo, so I can get a
proper account again.)
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Hans-Christian Egtvedt
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Around Sun 22 Jan 2012 15:46:33 +0100 or thereabout, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
>>> Enable use of the generic atomic64 implementation on AVR32 platforms.
>>> Without this the kernel fails to build as the architecture does not
>>> provide its version.
>>
>> Thanks for the fix. I don't have an AVR32 tree currently, as I lost my access
>> to kernel.org. Could it be merged in with generic fixes?
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <[email protected]>
>>
>> Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <[email protected]>
>>
>>> ---
>>> ?arch/avr32/Kconfig | ? ?1 +
>>> ?1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/avr32/Kconfig b/arch/avr32/Kconfig
>>> index 197e96f..3dea7231 100644
>>> --- a/arch/avr32/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/avr32/Kconfig
>>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ config AVR32
>>> ? ? ? select HAVE_KPROBES
>>> ? ? ? select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
>>> ? ? ? select GENERIC_IRQ_PROBE
>>> + ? ? select GENERIC_ATOMIC64
>>> ? ? ? select HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
>>> ? ? ? select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
>>> ? ? ? select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
--
mvh
Hans-Christian Egtvedt
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Hans-Christian Egtvedt
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Around Thu 02 Feb 2012 14:13:50 +0100 or thereabout, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
>> ? yes, I think so. Do you want me to re-send the patch to some
>> specific address? (like trivial fixes or so...).
>
> Andrew does sometimes pick these small patches up, I would really like it to
> go in as soon as possible. Try prefixing [RESEND] and add my Acked-by string.
Ok, I just resent it with the new ack'ed tag and Andrew in CC.
> .oO(I really need to find a kernel developer here in Oslo, so I can get a
> proper account again.)
I hope you find someone... An AVR32 branch on kernel.org would be nice!
Thanks!
--
Fabio Baltieri