From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
This is just a draft API to reduce the lookups in gatt_db and make it
a little bit more convenient for batch operations, so the general idea
is to be able to get a hold of it via gatt_db_get_attribute but also
replace the handles in the queues with proper attributes so the server
code don't have to lookup again when reading/writing, checking
permissions, or any other operation that can be done directly.
---
src/shared/gatt-db.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/shared/gatt-db.h b/src/shared/gatt-db.h
index 8d18434..ab7469a 100644
--- a/src/shared/gatt-db.h
+++ b/src/shared/gatt-db.h
@@ -96,3 +96,25 @@ bool gatt_db_get_service_uuid(struct gatt_db *db, uint16_t handle,
bool gatt_db_get_attribute_permissions(struct gatt_db *db, uint16_t handle,
uint32_t *permissions);
+
+struct gatt_db_attribute;
+
+struct gatt_db_attribute *gatt_db_get_attribute(struct gatt_db *attrib,
+ uint16_t handle, uint16_t offset);
+
+const bt_uuid_t *gatt_db_attribute_get_type(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib);
+
+bool gatt_db_attribute_get_service_uuid(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
+ bt_uuid_t *uuid);
+
+bool gatt_db_attribute_get_permissions(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
+ uint32_t *permissions);
+
+bool gatt_db_attribute_read(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
+ uint8_t opcode, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
+ void *callback, void *user_data);
+
+bool gatt_db_attribute_write(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
+ const uint8_t *value, size_t len,
+ uint8_t opcode, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
+ void *callback, void *user_data);
--
1.9.3
Hi Luiz,
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Arman,
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Arman Uguray <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Luiz,
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> This is just a draft API to reduce the lookups in gatt_db and make it
>>> a little bit more convenient for batch operations, so the general idea
>>> is to be able to get a hold of it via gatt_db_get_attribute but also
>>> replace the handles in the queues with proper attributes so the server
>>> code don't have to lookup again when reading/writing, checking
>>> permissions, or any other operation that can be done directly.
>>> ---
>>> src/shared/gatt-db.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/shared/gatt-db.h b/src/shared/gatt-db.h
>>> index 8d18434..ab7469a 100644
>>> --- a/src/shared/gatt-db.h
>>> +++ b/src/shared/gatt-db.h
>>> @@ -96,3 +96,25 @@ bool gatt_db_get_service_uuid(struct gatt_db *db, uint16_t handle,
>>>
>>> bool gatt_db_get_attribute_permissions(struct gatt_db *db, uint16_t handle,
>>> uint32_t *permissions);
>>> +
>>> +struct gatt_db_attribute;
>>> +
>>> +struct gatt_db_attribute *gatt_db_get_attribute(struct gatt_db *attrib,
>>> + uint16_t handle, uint16_t offset);
>>> +
>>
>> What's the offset parameter here for? Why not just get the attribute by handle?
>
> Probably an artifact of copy and pasting things around, it should be
> just the handle.
>
>>
>>> +const bt_uuid_t *gatt_db_attribute_get_type(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib);
>>> +
>>> +bool gatt_db_attribute_get_service_uuid(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
>>> + bt_uuid_t *uuid);
>>> +
>>> +bool gatt_db_attribute_get_permissions(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
>>> + uint32_t *permissions);
>>> +
>>> +bool gatt_db_attribute_read(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
>>> + uint8_t opcode, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
>>> + void *callback, void *user_data);
>>> +
>>> +bool gatt_db_attribute_write(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
>>> + const uint8_t *value, size_t len,
>>> + uint8_t opcode, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
>>> + void *callback, void *user_data);
>>> --
>>
>> Are these functions meant to replace the existing gatt_db_read, etc?
>> We might as well just replace all of those with functions that accept
>> a struct gatt_db_attribute. So that all functions would be preceded by
>> a call to gatt_db_get_attribute, followed by one of these functions.
>> Unless you want to keep the other functions as helpers that accomplish
>> the same thing.
>
> Yes this would replace some functions that requires handles, I just
> wanted to sync up first to get some feedback but it seems these
> changes will be straight forward and perhaps we don't even need to
> keep the old functions around.
>
Yeah, it makes sense to have these just replace the old ones I think.
Hi Arman,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Arman Uguray <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Luiz,
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
>>
>> This is just a draft API to reduce the lookups in gatt_db and make it
>> a little bit more convenient for batch operations, so the general idea
>> is to be able to get a hold of it via gatt_db_get_attribute but also
>> replace the handles in the queues with proper attributes so the server
>> code don't have to lookup again when reading/writing, checking
>> permissions, or any other operation that can be done directly.
>> ---
>> src/shared/gatt-db.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/shared/gatt-db.h b/src/shared/gatt-db.h
>> index 8d18434..ab7469a 100644
>> --- a/src/shared/gatt-db.h
>> +++ b/src/shared/gatt-db.h
>> @@ -96,3 +96,25 @@ bool gatt_db_get_service_uuid(struct gatt_db *db, uint16_t handle,
>>
>> bool gatt_db_get_attribute_permissions(struct gatt_db *db, uint16_t handle,
>> uint32_t *permissions);
>> +
>> +struct gatt_db_attribute;
>> +
>> +struct gatt_db_attribute *gatt_db_get_attribute(struct gatt_db *attrib,
>> + uint16_t handle, uint16_t offset);
>> +
>
> What's the offset parameter here for? Why not just get the attribute by handle?
Probably an artifact of copy and pasting things around, it should be
just the handle.
>
>> +const bt_uuid_t *gatt_db_attribute_get_type(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib);
>> +
>> +bool gatt_db_attribute_get_service_uuid(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
>> + bt_uuid_t *uuid);
>> +
>> +bool gatt_db_attribute_get_permissions(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
>> + uint32_t *permissions);
>> +
>> +bool gatt_db_attribute_read(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
>> + uint8_t opcode, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
>> + void *callback, void *user_data);
>> +
>> +bool gatt_db_attribute_write(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
>> + const uint8_t *value, size_t len,
>> + uint8_t opcode, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
>> + void *callback, void *user_data);
>> --
>
> Are these functions meant to replace the existing gatt_db_read, etc?
> We might as well just replace all of those with functions that accept
> a struct gatt_db_attribute. So that all functions would be preceded by
> a call to gatt_db_get_attribute, followed by one of these functions.
> Unless you want to keep the other functions as helpers that accomplish
> the same thing.
Yes this would replace some functions that requires handles, I just
wanted to sync up first to get some feedback but it seems these
changes will be straight forward and perhaps we don't even need to
keep the old functions around.
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Luiz,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz
<[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
>
> This is just a draft API to reduce the lookups in gatt_db and make it
> a little bit more convenient for batch operations, so the general idea
> is to be able to get a hold of it via gatt_db_get_attribute but also
> replace the handles in the queues with proper attributes so the server
> code don't have to lookup again when reading/writing, checking
> permissions, or any other operation that can be done directly.
> ---
> src/shared/gatt-db.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/shared/gatt-db.h b/src/shared/gatt-db.h
> index 8d18434..ab7469a 100644
> --- a/src/shared/gatt-db.h
> +++ b/src/shared/gatt-db.h
> @@ -96,3 +96,25 @@ bool gatt_db_get_service_uuid(struct gatt_db *db, uint16_t handle,
>
> bool gatt_db_get_attribute_permissions(struct gatt_db *db, uint16_t handle,
> uint32_t *permissions);
> +
> +struct gatt_db_attribute;
> +
> +struct gatt_db_attribute *gatt_db_get_attribute(struct gatt_db *attrib,
> + uint16_t handle, uint16_t offset);
> +
What's the offset parameter here for? Why not just get the attribute by handle?
> +const bt_uuid_t *gatt_db_attribute_get_type(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib);
> +
> +bool gatt_db_attribute_get_service_uuid(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
> + bt_uuid_t *uuid);
> +
> +bool gatt_db_attribute_get_permissions(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
> + uint32_t *permissions);
> +
> +bool gatt_db_attribute_read(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
> + uint8_t opcode, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
> + void *callback, void *user_data);
> +
> +bool gatt_db_attribute_write(struct gatt_db_attribute *attrib,
> + const uint8_t *value, size_t len,
> + uint8_t opcode, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
> + void *callback, void *user_data);
> --
Are these functions meant to replace the existing gatt_db_read, etc?
We might as well just replace all of those with functions that accept
a struct gatt_db_attribute. So that all functions would be preceded by
a call to gatt_db_get_attribute, followed by one of these functions.
Unless you want to keep the other functions as helpers that accomplish
the same thing.
> 1.9.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Cheers,
Arman