Adds the below client test cases:
1) Write Characteristic Value - by Client
2) Write Characteristic Value - Invalid Handle
3) Write Characteristic Value - Write Not Permitted
4) Write Characteristic Value - Insufficient Authorization
5) Write Characteristic Value - Insufficient Authentication
6) Write Characteristic Value - Insufficient Encryption Key Size
Gowtham Anandha Babu (6):
unit/test-gatt: Add TP/GAW/CL/BV-03-C test
unit/test-gatt: Add TP/GAW/CL/BI-02-C test
unit/test-gatt: Add TP/GAW/CL/BI-03-C test
unit/test-gatt: Add TP/GAW/CL/BI-04-C test
unit/test-gatt: Add TP/GAW/CL/BI-05-C test
unit/test-gatt: Add TP/GAW/CL/BI-06-C test
unit/test-gatt.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
Hi Gowtham,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Gowtham Anandha Babu
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Adds the below client test cases:
> 1) Write Characteristic Value - by Client
> 2) Write Characteristic Value - Invalid Handle
> 3) Write Characteristic Value - Write Not Permitted
> 4) Write Characteristic Value - Insufficient Authorization
> 5) Write Characteristic Value - Insufficient Authentication
> 6) Write Characteristic Value - Insufficient Encryption Key Size
>
>
> Gowtham Anandha Babu (6):
> unit/test-gatt: Add TP/GAW/CL/BV-03-C test
> unit/test-gatt: Add TP/GAW/CL/BI-02-C test
> unit/test-gatt: Add TP/GAW/CL/BI-03-C test
> unit/test-gatt: Add TP/GAW/CL/BI-04-C test
> unit/test-gatt: Add TP/GAW/CL/BI-05-C test
> unit/test-gatt: Add TP/GAW/CL/BI-06-C test
>
> unit/test-gatt.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.9.1
Applied, thanks.
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Gowtham,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Gowtham Anandha Babu
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Luiz,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-bluetooth-
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Luiz Augusto von Dentz
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 6:40 PM
>> To: Gowtham Anandha Babu
>> Cc: [email protected]; Bharat Panda; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] unit/test-gatt: Add TP/GAW/CL/BV-03-C test
>>
>> Hi Gowtham,
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Gowtham Anandha Babu
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Verify that a Generic Attribute Profile client can write a
>> > Characteristic Value selected by handle.
>> > ---
>> > unit/test-gatt.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/unit/test-gatt.c b/unit/test-gatt.c index
>> > 3ab5340..66b5794 100644
>> > --- a/unit/test-gatt.c
>> > +++ b/unit/test-gatt.c
>> > @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ struct context {
>> > raw_pdu(0x04, 0x04, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00), \
>> > raw_pdu(0x05, 0x01, 0x04, 0x00, 0x01, 0x29), \
>> > raw_pdu(0x08, 0x05, 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x03, 0x28), \
>> > - raw_pdu(0x09, 0x07, 0x06, 0x00, 0x02, 0x07, 0x00, 0x29, \
>> > + raw_pdu(0x09, 0x07, 0x06, 0x00, 0x0a, 0x07, 0x00,
>> > + 0x29, \
>> > 0x2a), \
>>
>> Is this a bug or something else that you need to change from 0x02 to 0x0a?
>
> This is to change the characteristic properties from 0x02 (BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ)
> to 0x0a (BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ | BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_WRITE), so that we are able to write a value
> to that characteristic.
>
> BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ - 0x02
> BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_WRITE - 0x08
> (BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ | BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_WRITE) - 0x0a
Well then it should be fine.
>
> Regards,
> Gowtham Anandha Babu
>
>>
>> > raw_pdu(0x08, 0x07, 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x03, 0x28), \
>> > raw_pdu(0x01, 0x08, 0x07, 0x00, 0x0a), \
>> > @@ -759,6 +759,34 @@ static const struct test_step test_read_12 = {
>> > .expected_att_ecode = 0x80,
>> > };
>> >
>> > +static void test_write_cb(bool success, uint8_t att_ecode, void
>> > +*user_data) {
>> > + struct context *context = user_data;
>> > + const struct test_step *step = context->data->step;
>> > +
>> > + g_assert(att_ecode == step->expected_att_ecode);
>> > +
>> > + context_quit(context);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static void test_write(struct context *context) {
>> > + const struct test_step *step = context->data->step;
>> > +
>> > + g_assert(bt_gatt_client_write_value(context->client, step->handle,
>> step->value,
>> > + step->length, test_write_cb, context,
>> > +NULL)); }
>> > +
>> > +static const uint8_t write_data_1[] = {0x01, 0x02, 0x03};
>> > +
>> > +static const struct test_step test_write_1 = {
>> > + .handle = 0x0007,
>> > + .func = test_write,
>> > + .expected_att_ecode = 0,
>> > + .value = write_data_1,
>> > + .length = 0x03
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > static void att_write_cb(struct gatt_db_attribute *att, int err,
>> > void
>> > *user_data) { @@ -957,7 +985,7 @@ static struct gatt_db
>> > *make_service_data_1_db(void)
>> > PRIMARY_SERVICE(0x0005, HEART_RATE_UUID, 4),
>> >
>> CHARACTERISTIC_STR(GATT_CHARAC_MANUFACTURER_NAME_STRING,
>> > BT_ATT_PERM_READ,
>> > - BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ, ""),
>> > + BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ
>> > + | BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_WRITE, ""),
>> > DESCRIPTOR_STR(GATT_CHARAC_USER_DESC_UUID,
>> BT_ATT_PERM_READ,
>> > "Manufacturer Name"),
>> > { }
>> > @@ -2845,5 +2873,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> > raw_pdu(0x0a, 0x03, 0x00),
>> > raw_pdu(0x01, 0x0a, 0x03, 0x00, 0x80));
>> >
>> > + define_test_client("/TP/GAW/CL/BV-03-C", test_client, service_db_1,
>> > + &test_write_1,
>> > + SERVICE_DATA_1_PDUS,
>> > + raw_pdu(0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03),
>> > + raw_pdu(0x13));
>> > +
>> > return tester_run();
>> > }
>> > --
>> > 1.9.1
>> >
>> > --
>> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>> > linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to [email protected]
>> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Luiz Augusto von Dentz
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
>> the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo
>> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Luiz,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-bluetooth-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Luiz Augusto von Dentz
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 6:40 PM
> To: Gowtham Anandha Babu
> Cc: [email protected]; Bharat Panda; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] unit/test-gatt: Add TP/GAW/CL/BV-03-C test
>
> Hi Gowtham,
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Gowtham Anandha Babu
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Verify that a Generic Attribute Profile client can write a
> > Characteristic Value selected by handle.
> > ---
> > unit/test-gatt.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/unit/test-gatt.c b/unit/test-gatt.c index
> > 3ab5340..66b5794 100644
> > --- a/unit/test-gatt.c
> > +++ b/unit/test-gatt.c
> > @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ struct context {
> > raw_pdu(0x04, 0x04, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00), \
> > raw_pdu(0x05, 0x01, 0x04, 0x00, 0x01, 0x29), \
> > raw_pdu(0x08, 0x05, 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x03, 0x28), \
> > - raw_pdu(0x09, 0x07, 0x06, 0x00, 0x02, 0x07, 0x00, 0x29, \
> > + raw_pdu(0x09, 0x07, 0x06, 0x00, 0x0a, 0x07, 0x00,
> > + 0x29, \
> > 0x2a), \
>
> Is this a bug or something else that you need to change from 0x02 to 0x0a?
This is to change the characteristic properties from 0x02 (BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ)
to 0x0a (BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ | BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_WRITE), so that we are able to write a value
to that characteristic.
BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ - 0x02
BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_WRITE - 0x08
(BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ | BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_WRITE) - 0x0a
Regards,
Gowtham Anandha Babu
>
> > raw_pdu(0x08, 0x07, 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x03, 0x28), \
> > raw_pdu(0x01, 0x08, 0x07, 0x00, 0x0a), \
> > @@ -759,6 +759,34 @@ static const struct test_step test_read_12 = {
> > .expected_att_ecode = 0x80,
> > };
> >
> > +static void test_write_cb(bool success, uint8_t att_ecode, void
> > +*user_data) {
> > + struct context *context = user_data;
> > + const struct test_step *step = context->data->step;
> > +
> > + g_assert(att_ecode == step->expected_att_ecode);
> > +
> > + context_quit(context);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void test_write(struct context *context) {
> > + const struct test_step *step = context->data->step;
> > +
> > + g_assert(bt_gatt_client_write_value(context->client, step->handle,
> step->value,
> > + step->length, test_write_cb, context,
> > +NULL)); }
> > +
> > +static const uint8_t write_data_1[] = {0x01, 0x02, 0x03};
> > +
> > +static const struct test_step test_write_1 = {
> > + .handle = 0x0007,
> > + .func = test_write,
> > + .expected_att_ecode = 0,
> > + .value = write_data_1,
> > + .length = 0x03
> > +};
> > +
> > static void att_write_cb(struct gatt_db_attribute *att, int err,
> > void
> > *user_data) { @@ -957,7 +985,7 @@ static struct gatt_db
> > *make_service_data_1_db(void)
> > PRIMARY_SERVICE(0x0005, HEART_RATE_UUID, 4),
> >
> CHARACTERISTIC_STR(GATT_CHARAC_MANUFACTURER_NAME_STRING,
> > BT_ATT_PERM_READ,
> > - BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ, ""),
> > + BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ
> > + | BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_WRITE, ""),
> > DESCRIPTOR_STR(GATT_CHARAC_USER_DESC_UUID,
> BT_ATT_PERM_READ,
> > "Manufacturer Name"),
> > { }
> > @@ -2845,5 +2873,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > raw_pdu(0x0a, 0x03, 0x00),
> > raw_pdu(0x01, 0x0a, 0x03, 0x00, 0x80));
> >
> > + define_test_client("/TP/GAW/CL/BV-03-C", test_client, service_db_1,
> > + &test_write_1,
> > + SERVICE_DATA_1_PDUS,
> > + raw_pdu(0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03),
> > + raw_pdu(0x13));
> > +
> > return tester_run();
> > }
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to [email protected]
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
> --
> Luiz Augusto von Dentz
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
> the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo
> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Gowtham,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Gowtham Anandha Babu
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Verify that a Generic Attribute Profile client can write a
> Characteristic Value selected by handle.
> ---
> unit/test-gatt.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/unit/test-gatt.c b/unit/test-gatt.c
> index 3ab5340..66b5794 100644
> --- a/unit/test-gatt.c
> +++ b/unit/test-gatt.c
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ struct context {
> raw_pdu(0x04, 0x04, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00), \
> raw_pdu(0x05, 0x01, 0x04, 0x00, 0x01, 0x29), \
> raw_pdu(0x08, 0x05, 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x03, 0x28), \
> - raw_pdu(0x09, 0x07, 0x06, 0x00, 0x02, 0x07, 0x00, 0x29, \
> + raw_pdu(0x09, 0x07, 0x06, 0x00, 0x0a, 0x07, 0x00, 0x29, \
> 0x2a), \
Is this a bug or something else that you need to change from 0x02 to 0x0a?
> raw_pdu(0x08, 0x07, 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x03, 0x28), \
> raw_pdu(0x01, 0x08, 0x07, 0x00, 0x0a), \
> @@ -759,6 +759,34 @@ static const struct test_step test_read_12 = {
> .expected_att_ecode = 0x80,
> };
>
> +static void test_write_cb(bool success, uint8_t att_ecode, void *user_data)
> +{
> + struct context *context = user_data;
> + const struct test_step *step = context->data->step;
> +
> + g_assert(att_ecode == step->expected_att_ecode);
> +
> + context_quit(context);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_write(struct context *context)
> +{
> + const struct test_step *step = context->data->step;
> +
> + g_assert(bt_gatt_client_write_value(context->client, step->handle, step->value,
> + step->length, test_write_cb, context, NULL));
> +}
> +
> +static const uint8_t write_data_1[] = {0x01, 0x02, 0x03};
> +
> +static const struct test_step test_write_1 = {
> + .handle = 0x0007,
> + .func = test_write,
> + .expected_att_ecode = 0,
> + .value = write_data_1,
> + .length = 0x03
> +};
> +
> static void att_write_cb(struct gatt_db_attribute *att, int err,
> void *user_data)
> {
> @@ -957,7 +985,7 @@ static struct gatt_db *make_service_data_1_db(void)
> PRIMARY_SERVICE(0x0005, HEART_RATE_UUID, 4),
> CHARACTERISTIC_STR(GATT_CHARAC_MANUFACTURER_NAME_STRING,
> BT_ATT_PERM_READ,
> - BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ, ""),
> + BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ | BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_WRITE, ""),
> DESCRIPTOR_STR(GATT_CHARAC_USER_DESC_UUID, BT_ATT_PERM_READ,
> "Manufacturer Name"),
> { }
> @@ -2845,5 +2873,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> raw_pdu(0x0a, 0x03, 0x00),
> raw_pdu(0x01, 0x0a, 0x03, 0x00, 0x80));
>
> + define_test_client("/TP/GAW/CL/BV-03-C", test_client, service_db_1,
> + &test_write_1,
> + SERVICE_DATA_1_PDUS,
> + raw_pdu(0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03),
> + raw_pdu(0x13));
> +
> return tester_run();
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Verify Generic Attribute Profile client behavior when the Write
Characteristic Value procedure fails due to insufficient encryption
key size.
---
unit/test-gatt.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/unit/test-gatt.c b/unit/test-gatt.c
index effd149..deac101 100644
--- a/unit/test-gatt.c
+++ b/unit/test-gatt.c
@@ -819,6 +819,14 @@ static const struct test_step test_write_5 = {
.length = 0x03
};
+static const struct test_step test_write_6 = {
+ .handle = 0x0007,
+ .func = test_write,
+ .expected_att_ecode = 0x0c,
+ .value = write_data_1,
+ .length = 0x03
+};
+
static void att_write_cb(struct gatt_db_attribute *att, int err,
void *user_data)
{
@@ -2935,5 +2943,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
raw_pdu(0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03),
raw_pdu(0x01, 0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x05));
+ define_test_client("/TP/GAW/CL/BI-06-C", test_client, service_db_1,
+ &test_write_6,
+ SERVICE_DATA_1_PDUS,
+ raw_pdu(0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03),
+ raw_pdu(0x01, 0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x0c));
+
return tester_run();
}
--
1.9.1
Verify Generic Attribute Profile client behavior when the
Write Characteristic Value procedure fails due to insufficient
authentication.
---
unit/test-gatt.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/unit/test-gatt.c b/unit/test-gatt.c
index 7a0c686..effd149 100644
--- a/unit/test-gatt.c
+++ b/unit/test-gatt.c
@@ -811,6 +811,14 @@ static const struct test_step test_write_4 = {
.length = 0x03
};
+static const struct test_step test_write_5 = {
+ .handle = 0x0007,
+ .func = test_write,
+ .expected_att_ecode = 0x05,
+ .value = write_data_1,
+ .length = 0x03
+};
+
static void att_write_cb(struct gatt_db_attribute *att, int err,
void *user_data)
{
@@ -2921,5 +2929,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
raw_pdu(0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03),
raw_pdu(0x01, 0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x08));
+ define_test_client("/TP/GAW/CL/BI-05-C", test_client, service_db_1,
+ &test_write_5,
+ SERVICE_DATA_1_PDUS,
+ raw_pdu(0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03),
+ raw_pdu(0x01, 0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x05));
+
return tester_run();
}
--
1.9.1
Verify Generic Attribute Profile client behavior when the
Write Characteristic Value procedure fails due to insufficient
authorization.
---
unit/test-gatt.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/unit/test-gatt.c b/unit/test-gatt.c
index e8085b6..7a0c686 100644
--- a/unit/test-gatt.c
+++ b/unit/test-gatt.c
@@ -803,6 +803,14 @@ static const struct test_step test_write_3 = {
.length = 0x03
};
+static const struct test_step test_write_4 = {
+ .handle = 0x0007,
+ .func = test_write,
+ .expected_att_ecode = 0x08,
+ .value = write_data_1,
+ .length = 0x03
+};
+
static void att_write_cb(struct gatt_db_attribute *att, int err,
void *user_data)
{
@@ -2907,5 +2915,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
raw_pdu(0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03),
raw_pdu(0x01, 0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x03));
+ define_test_client("/TP/GAW/CL/BI-04-C", test_client, service_db_1,
+ &test_write_4,
+ SERVICE_DATA_1_PDUS,
+ raw_pdu(0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03),
+ raw_pdu(0x01, 0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x08));
+
return tester_run();
}
--
1.9.1
Verify Generic Attribute Profile client behavior when the
Write Characteristic Value procedure fails due to write
not permitted.
---
unit/test-gatt.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/unit/test-gatt.c b/unit/test-gatt.c
index 9781b0e..e8085b6 100644
--- a/unit/test-gatt.c
+++ b/unit/test-gatt.c
@@ -795,6 +795,14 @@ static const struct test_step test_write_2 = {
.length = 0x03
};
+static const struct test_step test_write_3 = {
+ .handle = 0x0007,
+ .func = test_write,
+ .expected_att_ecode = 0x03,
+ .value = write_data_1,
+ .length = 0x03
+};
+
static void att_write_cb(struct gatt_db_attribute *att, int err,
void *user_data)
{
@@ -2893,5 +2901,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
raw_pdu(0x12, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03),
raw_pdu(0x01, 0x12, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01));
+ define_test_client("/TP/GAW/CL/BI-03-C", test_client, service_db_1,
+ &test_write_3,
+ SERVICE_DATA_1_PDUS,
+ raw_pdu(0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03),
+ raw_pdu(0x01, 0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x03));
+
return tester_run();
}
--
1.9.1
Verify Generic Attribute Profile client behavior when the
Write Characteristic Value procedure fails due to invalid
handle.
---
unit/test-gatt.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/unit/test-gatt.c b/unit/test-gatt.c
index 66b5794..9781b0e 100644
--- a/unit/test-gatt.c
+++ b/unit/test-gatt.c
@@ -787,6 +787,14 @@ static const struct test_step test_write_1 = {
.length = 0x03
};
+static const struct test_step test_write_2 = {
+ .handle = 0x0000,
+ .func = test_write,
+ .expected_att_ecode = 0x01,
+ .value = write_data_1,
+ .length = 0x03
+};
+
static void att_write_cb(struct gatt_db_attribute *att, int err,
void *user_data)
{
@@ -2879,5 +2887,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
raw_pdu(0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03),
raw_pdu(0x13));
+ define_test_client("/TP/GAW/CL/BI-02-C", test_client, service_db_1,
+ &test_write_2,
+ SERVICE_DATA_1_PDUS,
+ raw_pdu(0x12, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03),
+ raw_pdu(0x01, 0x12, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01));
+
return tester_run();
}
--
1.9.1
Verify that a Generic Attribute Profile client can write a
Characteristic Value selected by handle.
---
unit/test-gatt.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/unit/test-gatt.c b/unit/test-gatt.c
index 3ab5340..66b5794 100644
--- a/unit/test-gatt.c
+++ b/unit/test-gatt.c
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ struct context {
raw_pdu(0x04, 0x04, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00), \
raw_pdu(0x05, 0x01, 0x04, 0x00, 0x01, 0x29), \
raw_pdu(0x08, 0x05, 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x03, 0x28), \
- raw_pdu(0x09, 0x07, 0x06, 0x00, 0x02, 0x07, 0x00, 0x29, \
+ raw_pdu(0x09, 0x07, 0x06, 0x00, 0x0a, 0x07, 0x00, 0x29, \
0x2a), \
raw_pdu(0x08, 0x07, 0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x03, 0x28), \
raw_pdu(0x01, 0x08, 0x07, 0x00, 0x0a), \
@@ -759,6 +759,34 @@ static const struct test_step test_read_12 = {
.expected_att_ecode = 0x80,
};
+static void test_write_cb(bool success, uint8_t att_ecode, void *user_data)
+{
+ struct context *context = user_data;
+ const struct test_step *step = context->data->step;
+
+ g_assert(att_ecode == step->expected_att_ecode);
+
+ context_quit(context);
+}
+
+static void test_write(struct context *context)
+{
+ const struct test_step *step = context->data->step;
+
+ g_assert(bt_gatt_client_write_value(context->client, step->handle, step->value,
+ step->length, test_write_cb, context, NULL));
+}
+
+static const uint8_t write_data_1[] = {0x01, 0x02, 0x03};
+
+static const struct test_step test_write_1 = {
+ .handle = 0x0007,
+ .func = test_write,
+ .expected_att_ecode = 0,
+ .value = write_data_1,
+ .length = 0x03
+};
+
static void att_write_cb(struct gatt_db_attribute *att, int err,
void *user_data)
{
@@ -957,7 +985,7 @@ static struct gatt_db *make_service_data_1_db(void)
PRIMARY_SERVICE(0x0005, HEART_RATE_UUID, 4),
CHARACTERISTIC_STR(GATT_CHARAC_MANUFACTURER_NAME_STRING,
BT_ATT_PERM_READ,
- BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ, ""),
+ BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_READ | BT_GATT_CHRC_PROP_WRITE, ""),
DESCRIPTOR_STR(GATT_CHARAC_USER_DESC_UUID, BT_ATT_PERM_READ,
"Manufacturer Name"),
{ }
@@ -2845,5 +2873,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
raw_pdu(0x0a, 0x03, 0x00),
raw_pdu(0x01, 0x0a, 0x03, 0x00, 0x80));
+ define_test_client("/TP/GAW/CL/BV-03-C", test_client, service_db_1,
+ &test_write_1,
+ SERVICE_DATA_1_PDUS,
+ raw_pdu(0x12, 0x07, 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03),
+ raw_pdu(0x13));
+
return tester_run();
}
--
1.9.1