Due to cache in gatt db, bluetoothd fails to update publish the battery
value after reconnection when the battery value does not change compared
to before reconnection. For initial battery value, we should update the
value to D-Bus regardless of the cache value.
---
profiles/battery/battery.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/profiles/battery/battery.c b/profiles/battery/battery.c
index 81f849d57..0f8d6ef18 100644
--- a/profiles/battery/battery.c
+++ b/profiles/battery/battery.c
@@ -88,12 +88,13 @@ static void batt_reset(struct batt *batt)
}
static void parse_battery_level(struct batt *batt,
- const uint8_t *value)
+ const uint8_t *value,
+ bool force_update)
{
uint8_t percentage;
percentage = value[0];
- if (batt->percentage != percentage) {
+ if (force_update || batt->percentage != percentage) {
batt->percentage = percentage;
DBG("Battery Level updated: %d%%", percentage);
if (!batt->battery) {
@@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ static void batt_io_value_cb(uint16_t value_handle, const uint8_t *value,
struct batt *batt = user_data;
if (value_handle == batt->batt_level_io_handle) {
- parse_battery_level(batt, value);
+ parse_battery_level(batt, value, false /* force_update */);
} else {
g_assert_not_reached();
}
@@ -134,7 +135,7 @@ static void batt_io_ccc_written_cb(uint16_t att_ecode, void *user_data)
return;
}
- parse_battery_level(batt, batt->initial_value);
+ parse_battery_level(batt, batt->initial_value, true /* force_update */);
g_free (batt->initial_value);
batt->initial_value = NULL;
--
2.29.2
On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 10:09 -0700, Sonny Sasaka wrote:
> Due to cache in gatt db, bluetoothd fails to update publish the battery
> value after reconnection when the battery value does not change
> compared
> to before reconnection. For initial battery value, we should update the
> value to D-Bus regardless of the cache value.
>
> ---
> profiles/battery/battery.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/profiles/battery/battery.c b/profiles/battery/battery.c
> index 81f849d57..0f8d6ef18 100644
> --- a/profiles/battery/battery.c
> +++ b/profiles/battery/battery.c
> @@ -88,12 +88,13 @@ static void batt_reset(struct batt *batt)
> }
>
> static void parse_battery_level(struct batt *batt,
> - const uint8_t *value)
> + const uint8_t *value,
> + bool force_update)
> {
> uint8_t percentage;
>
> percentage = value[0];
> - if (batt->percentage != percentage) {
> + if (force_update || batt->percentage != percentage) {
> batt->percentage = percentage;
> DBG("Battery Level updated: %d%%", percentage);
> if (!batt->battery) {
> @@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ static void batt_io_value_cb(uint16_t value_handle,
> const uint8_t *value,
> struct batt *batt = user_data;
>
> if (value_handle == batt->batt_level_io_handle) {
> - parse_battery_level(batt, value);
> + parse_battery_level(batt, value, false /* force_update
> */);
> } else {
> g_assert_not_reached();
> }
> @@ -134,7 +135,7 @@ static void batt_io_ccc_written_cb(uint16_t
> att_ecode, void *user_data)
> return;
> }
>
> - parse_battery_level(batt, batt->initial_value);
> + parse_battery_level(batt, batt->initial_value, true /*
> force_update */);
If you need to do this, that means that you should probably declare an
enum instead.
This is old, but still relevant:
https://blog.ometer.com/2011/01/20/boolean-parameters-are-wrong/
> g_free (batt->initial_value);
> batt->initial_value = NULL;
>
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=458223
---Test result---
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - PASS
##############################
Test: CheckGitLint - PASS
##############################
Test: CheckBuild: Setup ELL - PASS
##############################
Test: CheckBuild: Setup - PASS
##############################
Test: CheckBuild - PASS
##############################
Test: MakeCheck - PASS
##############################
Test: CheckBuild w/external ell - PASS
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
Hi Bastien,
That's a good idea. I updated it in v2.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:16 AM Bastien Nocera <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 10:09 -0700, Sonny Sasaka wrote:
> > Due to cache in gatt db, bluetoothd fails to update publish the battery
> > value after reconnection when the battery value does not change
> > compared
> > to before reconnection. For initial battery value, we should update the
> > value to D-Bus regardless of the cache value.
> >
> > ---
> > profiles/battery/battery.c | 9 +++++----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/profiles/battery/battery.c b/profiles/battery/battery.c
> > index 81f849d57..0f8d6ef18 100644
> > --- a/profiles/battery/battery.c
> > +++ b/profiles/battery/battery.c
> > @@ -88,12 +88,13 @@ static void batt_reset(struct batt *batt)
> > }
> >
> > static void parse_battery_level(struct batt *batt,
> > - const uint8_t *value)
> > + const uint8_t *value,
> > + bool force_update)
> > {
> > uint8_t percentage;
> >
> > percentage = value[0];
> > - if (batt->percentage != percentage) {
> > + if (force_update || batt->percentage != percentage) {
> > batt->percentage = percentage;
> > DBG("Battery Level updated: %d%%", percentage);
> > if (!batt->battery) {
> > @@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ static void batt_io_value_cb(uint16_t value_handle,
> > const uint8_t *value,
> > struct batt *batt = user_data;
> >
> > if (value_handle == batt->batt_level_io_handle) {
> > - parse_battery_level(batt, value);
> > + parse_battery_level(batt, value, false /* force_update
> > */);
> > } else {
> > g_assert_not_reached();
> > }
> > @@ -134,7 +135,7 @@ static void batt_io_ccc_written_cb(uint16_t
> > att_ecode, void *user_data)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > - parse_battery_level(batt, batt->initial_value);
> > + parse_battery_level(batt, batt->initial_value, true /*
> > force_update */);
>
> If you need to do this, that means that you should probably declare an
> enum instead.
>
> This is old, but still relevant:
> https://blog.ometer.com/2011/01/20/boolean-parameters-are-wrong/
>
> > g_free (batt->initial_value);
> > batt->initial_value = NULL;
> >
>
>
Hi Sonny,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:12 AM Sonny Sasaka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Due to cache in gatt db, bluetoothd fails to update publish the battery
> value after reconnection when the battery value does not change compared
> to before reconnection. For initial battery value, we should update the
> value to D-Bus regardless of the cache value.
>
> ---
> profiles/battery/battery.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/profiles/battery/battery.c b/profiles/battery/battery.c
> index 81f849d57..0f8d6ef18 100644
> --- a/profiles/battery/battery.c
> +++ b/profiles/battery/battery.c
> @@ -88,12 +88,13 @@ static void batt_reset(struct batt *batt)
> }
>
> static void parse_battery_level(struct batt *batt,
> - const uint8_t *value)
> + const uint8_t *value,
> + bool force_update)
> {
> uint8_t percentage;
>
> percentage = value[0];
> - if (batt->percentage != percentage) {
> + if (force_update || batt->percentage != percentage) {
> batt->percentage = percentage;
> DBG("Battery Level updated: %d%%", percentage);
> if (!batt->battery) {
> @@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ static void batt_io_value_cb(uint16_t value_handle, const uint8_t *value,
> struct batt *batt = user_data;
>
> if (value_handle == batt->batt_level_io_handle) {
> - parse_battery_level(batt, value);
> + parse_battery_level(batt, value, false /* force_update */);
> } else {
> g_assert_not_reached();
> }
> @@ -134,7 +135,7 @@ static void batt_io_ccc_written_cb(uint16_t att_ecode, void *user_data)
> return;
> }
>
> - parse_battery_level(batt, batt->initial_value);
> + parse_battery_level(batt, batt->initial_value, true /* force_update */);
I guess it would have been better to reset the initial_value on disconnect.
> g_free (batt->initial_value);
> batt->initial_value = NULL;
>
> --
> 2.29.2
>
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Luiz,
That's a good idea. Please take a look at the latest patch titled
"Reset battery value cache on disconnect".
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:25 AM Luiz Augusto von Dentz
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Sonny,
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:12 AM Sonny Sasaka <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Due to cache in gatt db, bluetoothd fails to update publish the battery
> > value after reconnection when the battery value does not change compared
> > to before reconnection. For initial battery value, we should update the
> > value to D-Bus regardless of the cache value.
> >
> > ---
> > profiles/battery/battery.c | 9 +++++----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/profiles/battery/battery.c b/profiles/battery/battery.c
> > index 81f849d57..0f8d6ef18 100644
> > --- a/profiles/battery/battery.c
> > +++ b/profiles/battery/battery.c
> > @@ -88,12 +88,13 @@ static void batt_reset(struct batt *batt)
> > }
> >
> > static void parse_battery_level(struct batt *batt,
> > - const uint8_t *value)
> > + const uint8_t *value,
> > + bool force_update)
> > {
> > uint8_t percentage;
> >
> > percentage = value[0];
> > - if (batt->percentage != percentage) {
> > + if (force_update || batt->percentage != percentage) {
> > batt->percentage = percentage;
> > DBG("Battery Level updated: %d%%", percentage);
> > if (!batt->battery) {
> > @@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ static void batt_io_value_cb(uint16_t value_handle, const uint8_t *value,
> > struct batt *batt = user_data;
> >
> > if (value_handle == batt->batt_level_io_handle) {
> > - parse_battery_level(batt, value);
> > + parse_battery_level(batt, value, false /* force_update */);
> > } else {
> > g_assert_not_reached();
> > }
> > @@ -134,7 +135,7 @@ static void batt_io_ccc_written_cb(uint16_t att_ecode, void *user_data)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > - parse_battery_level(batt, batt->initial_value);
> > + parse_battery_level(batt, batt->initial_value, true /* force_update */);
>
> I guess it would have been better to reset the initial_value on disconnect.
>
> > g_free (batt->initial_value);
> > batt->initial_value = NULL;
> >
> > --
> > 2.29.2
> >
>
>
> --
> Luiz Augusto von Dentz