On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:15:48 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 8:18 PM, Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 19:44 +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > > NFSv2/3 and NFSv4 share the same dentry_iput and so share the same
> > > unlink and sillyrename logic.
> > > But they do not share nfs_init_server()!
> > >
> > > I wonder why this doesn't blow up more violently, but only hangs...
> > >
> > > But as I don't know if it is correct to add the workqueue
> > > initialization to nfs4_init_server() or remove the nfs_sb_active /
> > > nfs_sb_deactive for the NFSv4 case, I can't offer a patch to fix this.
> > >
> > > Torsten
> >
> > I had already fixed that one in my own stack. Attached are the 3 patches
> > that I've got. 1 from SteveD, 2 fixes.
> >
>
> Moving the init_waitqueue_head() like patch
> linux-2.6.24-006-fix_to_fix_sillyrename_bug_on_umount.dif and applying
> linux-2.6.24-007-fix_nfs_free_unlinkdata.dif lets my testcase work.
> Also lockdep no longer complains about the non-static key.
>
Thanks.
To avoid goofups, could you please send the full fix against 2.6.24-rc2-mm1?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
_______________________________________________
Please note that [email protected] is being discontinued.
Please subscribe to [email protected] instead.
http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-nfs