2009-03-05 16:42:23

by Daniel Walsh

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [refpolicy] services_ktalk.patch

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/services_ktalk.patch

ktalkd read/writes all terminals to communicate locally.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmwAO8ACgkQrlYvE4MpobP8pwCg1OP0dVtLJaR7b9MlWi7Eb8UN
l2oAn3WVfU+8X5QJMJWcGNVki9PN4WC0
=x+Fn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


2009-04-07 15:09:04

by cpebenito

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [refpolicy] services_ktalk.patch

On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 12:42 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/services_ktalk.patch
>
> ktalkd read/writes all terminals to communicate locally.

It seems like user terminals would be sufficient. Why would it send
messages to terminals not associated with a user session?

--
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150

2009-04-07 16:31:32

by Daniel Walsh

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [refpolicy] services_ktalk.patch

On 04/07/2009 11:09 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 12:42 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/services_ktalk.patch
>>
>> ktalkd read/writes all terminals to communicate locally.
>
> It seems like user terminals would be sufficient. Why would it send
> messages to terminals not associated with a user session?
>
Ok I will go along with that.