still HTML and as such not really useful.
However,
> +int p54_parse_eeprom(struct ieee80211_hw *dev, void *eeprom, int
> len);
How about just killing the export instead? It isn't used anywhere else
anyway?
johannes
Christian Lamparter wrote:
> if only kmail let me disable it! :-)
> Is it off now? If not, I'm really sorry, for all html ****.
> I'll fix it, but it'll take another while.
Seems to be ok now.
>> However,
>>
>> > +int p54_parse_eeprom(struct ieee80211_hw *dev, void *eeprom, int
>> > len);
>>
>> How about just killing the export instead? It isn't used anywhere else
>> anyway?
>
> True.
>
> on the other hand: what about stlc45xx (p54spi)?
> These ?SoC? chips don't have any eeprom attached to the I2C, but they
> need calibration data and output power limits like the usb/pci parts as
> well.
Yeah, but it hardly matters now, we can always re-export it when needed.
johannes
On Monday 06 October 2008 22:47:45 Johannes Berg wrote:
> still HTML and as such not really useful.
>
if only kmail let me disable it! :-)
Is it off now? If not, I'm really sorry, for all html ****.
I'll fix it, but it'll take another while.
> However,
>
> > +int p54_parse_eeprom(struct ieee80211_hw *dev, void *eeprom, int
> > len);
>
> How about just killing the export instead? It isn't used anywhere else
> anyway?
True.
on the other hand: what about stlc45xx (p54spi)?
These ?SoC? chips don't have any eeprom attached to the I2C, but they
need calibration data and output power limits like the usb/pci parts as well.
Regards,
Chr