Attached is a trivial patch to make packaging a bit easier.
No strong feelings either way, so rejection will cause no
hard feelings :-)
-RW
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 20:18 -0800, Robby Workman wrote:
> Attached is a trivial patch to make packaging a bit easier.
> No strong feelings either way, so rejection will cause no
> hard feelings :-)
Heh. You really should CC me, but I've applied it.
johannes
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 08:18 -0800, Robby Workman wrote:
> Okay, thanks! Re the CC, I probably overlooked it, but I didn't
> see iw listed in the Maintainers list on the wiki, and there was
> no AUTHORS file in the source.
Heh, sorry, I guess I figured it was fairly obvious since it's in git
and I commit everything, it's hosted on my server etc. I can add an
authors list or just add a note about who maintains it to the readme
file.
johannes
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 20:18 -0800, Robby Workman wrote:
>> Attached is a trivial patch to make packaging a bit easier.
>> No strong feelings either way, so rejection will cause no
>> hard feelings :-)
>
> Heh. You really should CC me, but I've applied it.
>
Okay, thanks! Re the CC, I probably overlooked it, but I didn't
see iw listed in the Maintainers list on the wiki, and there was
no AUTHORS file in the source. Either way, much appreciated.
-RW
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 08:18 -0800, Robby Workman wrote:
>
>> Okay, thanks! Re the CC, I probably overlooked it, but I didn't
>> see iw listed in the Maintainers list on the wiki, and there was
>> no AUTHORS file in the source.
>
> Heh, sorry, I guess I figured it was fairly obvious since it's in git
> and I commit everything, it's hosted on my server etc. I can add an
> authors list or just add a note about who maintains it to the readme
> file.
Well... I didn't look at the previous commit history, but in hindsight,
I should have, and it *is* fairly obvious. :-) Thanks again.
-RW