RX is handled in a workqueue therefore allocating for GFP_ATOMIC
is overkill and not required.
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>
---
This goes untested and not even compile tested but just thought this was odd.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_rx.c
index 37d81ab..ca645f3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_rx.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static void wl1271_rx_handle_data(struct wl1271 *wl, u32 length)
u8 *buf;
u8 beacon = 0;
- skb = dev_alloc_skb(length);
+ skb = __dev_alloc_skb(length, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!skb) {
wl1271_error("Couldn't allocate RX frame");
return;
Coelho Luciano (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote:
> Hi Luiz,
Oops! s/Luiz/Luis/
--
Cheers,
Luca.
Hi Luiz,
ext Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> RX is handled in a workqueue therefore allocating for GFP_ATOMIC
> is overkill and not required.
Yes, this looks like the correct thing to do. Thank you for pointing out! Can
you send the patch again to Linville for integration?
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>
>
> ---
>
> This goes untested and not even compile tested but just thought this was odd.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_rx.c
> index 37d81ab..ca645f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_rx.c
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static void wl1271_rx_handle_data(struct wl1271 *wl, u32 length)
> u8 *buf;
> u8 beacon = 0;
>
> - skb = dev_alloc_skb(length);
> + skb = __dev_alloc_skb(length, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!skb) {
> wl1271_error("Couldn't allocate RX frame");
> return;
Acked-by: Luciano Coelho <[email protected]>
--
Cheers,
Luca.