On 11/05/2011 11:43 AM, Andres Cimmarusti wrote:
> Dear Mr. Finger,
>
> I apologize for the audacity of contacting you directly. I saw your
> name and email on one of the source files for the realtek wireless
> drivers.
> I have a question about the Realtek wireless driver (specifically
> rtl8192se) version included in kernels 3.0.x and 3.1.x.
>
> If I go to Realtek's website they mention a driver version:
> rtl_92ce_92se_92de_linux_mac80211_0004.0816.2011
>
> Is this included in kernel 3.0.x? or should I upgrade to 3.1?
>
> I've been having a lot of disconnection and reconnection issues with
> certain networks using a RTL8191SEvB (which loads the rtl8192se driver
> module). I don't know for sure what the problem is, but I've noticed
> that in areas (like university campuses) where there might be repeated
> access points for the same network with varying signal strengths, my
> connection is rather unstable and it keeps disconnecting and
> reconnecting (I suspect there is a problem reporting the signal
> strength to NetworkManager, which causes NM to get confused as to
> which network has stronger signal...I mean in NM 0.8.4 all networks
> listed show the same number of "bars"!). Since the rtl8192se is a
> relatively new driver in the kernel, I was hoping getting the newest
> version would help solve this issue.
>
> If you have any info regarding this issue I would appreciate it very
> much. I've seen some posts online that blame it on NM...I will try to
> peruse through their bugs and see...
Note that I only do private consulting for a fee. You should send everything
through the wireless ML, which I have added to this reply.
The newest version, i.e. 3.1, will have an improved driver. One with even more
improvements will be in the bleeding-edge compat-wireless package. It is
essentially the one for 3.2. Yes, rtl8192se is being improved regularly. All the
improvements in the 08/16/2011 driver are in compat-wireless.
The number of "bars" in the NM applet are hardly a good measure of signal
strength, but the driver does report a better value. I do not have an
environment where I can test roaming.
Larry