From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[email protected]>
Firmware licenses on linux-firmware should include an implicit
or explicit patent grant to end users for full device operation
otherwise it would start making linux-firmware useless for many
Linux distributions which have positions against patent encumbered
software [0] [1] [2] and it would mean cherry picking firmware files
out. It can also mean making it problematic to redistribute linux-firmware
in some jurisdictions which could have different positions on
patents, or have already outlawed software patents.
Licenses with implicit patent grants are allowed given that otherwise
we couldn't carry permissively licensed firmwares which would be silly,
but using permissively licensed firmware files which remove patent
grants explicitly are not allowed.
A clarifications is needed as one attempt was already made to include
firmware encumbered by patents without a grant [3] and it was decided
we would not allow these. We clarify this to make this requirement
explicit and prevent these type of further attempts.
[0] https://www.debian.org/legal/patent
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Software_Patents#Red_Hat.27s_position_on_Software_Patents
[2] http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/about-us/
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/14/182
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>
---
This v2 just changes "licence" to "license" as requested by Arend.
README | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README b/README
index f2ed92e..cdaecf0 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -17,8 +17,11 @@ diff or preferably a git pull request to:
and also cc: to related mailing lists.
Your commit should include an update to the WHENCE file clearly
-identifying the licence under which the firmware is available, and
-that it is redistributable. If the licence is long and involved, it's
+identifying the license under which the firmware is available, and
+that it is redistributable. Being redistributable includes ensuring
+the firmware license provided includes an implicit or explicit
+patent grant to end users to ensure full functionality of device
+operation with the firmware. If the license is long and involved, it's
permitted to include it in a separate file and refer to it from the
WHENCE file.
And if it were possible, a changelog of the firmware itself.
--
2.3.2.209.gd67f9d5.dirty
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
<[email protected]> wrote:
> This v2 just changes "licence" to "license" as requested by Arend.
Please let me know if there is anything else needed.
Luis
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This v2 just changes "licence" to "license" as requested by Arend.
>
> Please let me know if there is anything else needed.
Just a friendly reminder.
Luis
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 06:02:56PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> This v2 just changes "licence" to "license" as requested by Arend.
> >
> > Please let me know if there is anything else needed.
>
> Just a friendly reminder.
>
Pulled, sorry.
--Kyle