Nigel Gamble ([email protected])

Number of posts: 46 (0.1 per day)
First post: 2000-11-23 00:34:35
Last post: 2002-02-27 00:56:51

Date	List	Subject
2002-02-27 00:56:51	linux-kernel	Re: schedule()
2002-02-16 04:43:34	linux-kernel	[PATCH] Preemption logging
2002-02-08 16:52:19	linux-kernel	Re: [RFC] New locking primitive for 2.5
2002-02-08 08:21:16	linux-kernel	Re: [RFC] New locking primitive for 2.5
2002-01-31 21:07:22	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] 2.5: push BKL out of llseek
2002-01-30 09:34:56	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] 2.5: push BKL out of llseek
2002-01-30 02:50:56	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] 2.5: push BKL out of llseek
2002-01-28 20:30:16	linux-kernel	Re: Don't use dbench for benchmarks
2002-01-28 16:56:53	linux-kernel	Re: Don't use dbench for benchmarks
2002-01-27 22:11:46	linux-kernel	Re: Preempt & how long it takes to interrupt (was Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable)
2002-01-26 10:08:19	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] syscall latency improvement #1
2002-01-11 02:48:26	linux-kernel	Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
2001-12-05 23:18:08	linux-kernel	Re: SMP/cc Cluster description [was Linux/Pro]
2001-12-04 22:08:16	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] improve spinlock debugging
2001-12-04 21:22:00	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] improve spinlock debugging
2001-10-03 00:45:16	linux-kernel	Re: Re[2]: Latency measurements
2001-07-30 22:48:17	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] [IMPORTANT] Re: 2.4.7 softirq incorrectness.
2001-04-27 23:22:32	linux-kernel	Re: #define HZ 1024 -- negative effects?
2001-04-27 19:27:11	linux-kernel	Re: #define HZ 1024 -- negative effects?
2001-04-26 23:54:51	linux-kernel	Viewing SCHED_FIFO, SCHED_RR stats in /proc
2001-04-25 22:41:11	linux-kernel	Re: #define HZ 1024 -- negative effects?
2001-04-25 01:58:38	linux-kernel	Re: Scheduling bug for SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR
2001-04-21 19:06:23	linux-kernel	Re: 2.4.3+ sound distortion
2001-04-20 23:50:46	linux-kernel	Scheduling bug for SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR
2001-04-11 08:38:13	linux-kernel	Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-04-11 08:20:21	linux-kernel	Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-04-10 23:49:50	linux-kernel	Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-04-09 23:28:51	linux-kernel	Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-04-01 21:14:46	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-04-01 21:08:46	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-03-30 00:27:52	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-03-23 23:54:07	linux-kernel	Re: Use semaphore for producer/consumer case...
2001-03-23 20:43:21	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-03-22 03:12:25	linux-kernel	lock_kernel() usage and sync_*() functions
2001-03-22 00:22:16	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-03-21 18:19:52	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-03-21 03:36:34	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-03-21 00:49:19	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-03-21 00:25:17	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-03-20 22:07:56	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-03-19 21:02:44	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-03-16 20:57:31	linux-kernel	Locking question (was: [CHECKER] 9 potential copy_*_user bugs in 2.4.1)
2001-03-15 01:26:43	linux-kernel	[PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
2001-03-06 23:54:49	linux-kernel	Re: spinlock help
2000-12-19 00:47:20	linux-kernel	Re: [RFC] Semaphores used for daemon wakeup
2000-11-23 00:34:35	linux-kernel	[PATCH] Latest preemptible kernel (low latency) patch available