Bernd Petrovitsch ([email protected])

Number of posts: 318 (0.14 per day)
First post: 2003-06-29 20:43:49
Last post: 2009-12-01 11:43:46

Date List Subject
2006-02-08 09:46:29 linux-kernel Re: Linux drivers management
2006-02-07 09:45:27 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH ] VMSPLIT config options (with default config fixed)
2006-02-07 00:01:04 linux-kernel Re: Linux drivers management
2006-02-02 11:02:15 linux-kernel Re: root=LABEL= problem [Was: Re: Linux Issue]
2006-02-01 16:17:13 linux-kernel Re: root=LABEL= problem [Was: Re: Linux Issue]
2006-02-01 15:56:16 linux-kernel Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
2006-01-28 11:39:36 linux-kernel Re: GPL V3 and Linux
2006-01-27 10:25:42 linux-kernel Re: GPL V3 and Linux
2006-01-27 09:54:15 linux-kernel Re: GPL V3 and Linux
2006-01-26 21:49:27 linux-kernel Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
2006-01-26 08:47:53 linux-kernel Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
2006-01-25 15:47:45 linux-kernel Re: [RFC] VM: I have a dream...
2006-01-25 09:42:31 linux-kernel Re: GPL V3 and Linux
2006-01-25 09:24:59 linux-kernel Re: [RFC] VM: I have a dream...
2006-01-24 09:11:30 linux-kernel Re: GPL V3 and Linux
2006-01-23 09:52:28 linux-kernel Re: GPL V3 and Linux
2006-01-22 17:07:40 linux-kernel Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
2006-01-22 16:13:58 linux-kernel Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
2006-01-21 22:55:44 linux-kernel Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
2006-01-21 22:53:46 linux-kernel Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
2006-01-20 23:22:05 linux-kernel Re: Development tree, PLEASE?
2006-01-11 16:13:00 linux-kernel Re: FAT and Microsoft patent?
2006-01-11 15:39:03 linux-kernel Re: FAT and Microsoft patent?
2006-01-11 13:59:51 linux-kernel Re: OT: fork(): parent or child should run first?
2006-01-11 13:28:53 linux-kernel Re: OT: fork(): parent or child should run first?
2006-01-09 17:14:53 linux-kernel Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
2006-01-09 17:01:56 linux-kernel Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
2006-01-09 16:32:58 linux-kernel Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
2006-01-09 16:29:22 linux-kernel Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
2006-01-09 14:32:58 linux-kernel Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
2005-12-30 17:17:56 linux-kernel Re: userspace breakage
2005-12-30 11:22:04 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional
2005-12-30 11:20:04 linux-kernel Re: userspace breakage
2005-12-30 11:18:28 linux-kernel Re: userspace breakage
2005-12-15 09:14:06 linux-kernel Re: Question
2005-12-15 09:11:49 linux-kernel Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-14 09:21:48 linux-kernel Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-13 23:05:55 linux-kernel Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-13 09:52:25 linux-kernel Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-12 15:38:55 linux-kernel Re: GNU/Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-12 13:46:36 linux-kernel Re: GNU/Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-11 13:56:37 linux-kernel Re: GNU/Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-11 13:24:39 linux-kernel Re: GNU/Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-09 09:54:05 linux-kernel Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-07 10:36:09 linux-kernel Re: Urgent work ! please help
2005-12-06 23:26:18 linux-kernel Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-06 12:20:12 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Win32 equivalent to GetTickCount systemcall (i386)
2005-12-06 09:38:24 linux-kernel Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
2005-12-06 09:33:17 linux-kernel Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-06 09:16:54 linux-kernel Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-06 00:21:32 linux-kernel Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario