Robert Love ([email protected])

Number of posts: 60 (0.22 per day)
First post: 2004-01-01 15:22:55
Last post: 2004-10-04 18:56:57

Date List Subject
2004-10-04 18:56:57 linux-kernel [patch] inotify: more misc stuff
2004-09-30 21:38:24 linux-kernel [patch] inotify: ioctl makeover
2004-09-27 20:43:57 linux-kernel [patch] inotify: don't check private_data
2004-09-27 20:11:29 linux-kernel Re: [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.10.0
2004-09-27 19:54:50 linux-kernel [patch] inotify: doh
2004-09-27 16:39:17 linux-kernel Re: [gamin] [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.10.0 [u]
2004-09-27 16:25:32 linux-kernel Re: [gamin] [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.10.0 [u]
2004-09-21 05:44:24 linux-kernel Re: [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.9.2
2004-09-15 02:10:33 linux-kernel Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
2004-09-15 01:19:43 linux-kernel Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
2004-09-14 19:33:58 linux-kernel Re: [patch] sched: fix scheduling latencies for !PREEMPT kernels
2004-09-14 19:32:54 linux-kernel Re: [patch] sched: fix scheduling latencies for !PREEMPT kernels
2004-09-14 19:08:33 linux-kernel Re: [patch] sched: fix scheduling latencies for !PREEMPT kernels
2004-09-14 18:18:21 linux-kernel Re: [patch] sched: fix scheduling latencies for !PREEMPT kernels
2004-09-11 04:44:15 linux-kernel Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
2004-09-11 04:08:38 linux-kernel Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
2004-09-10 02:15:42 linux-kernel Re: Re: What File System supports Application XIP
2004-09-09 17:45:18 linux-kernel Re: What File System supports Application XIP
2004-09-05 03:59:42 linux-kernel Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
2004-09-05 03:01:49 linux-kernel Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
2004-09-05 02:58:15 linux-kernel Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
2004-09-02 18:42:13 linux-kernel Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
2004-09-02 16:29:47 linux-kernel Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
2004-09-02 16:26:41 linux-kernel Re: [patch] kernel sysfs events layer
2004-06-23 19:23:33 linux-kernel Re: status of Preemptible Kernel 2.6.7
2004-06-23 19:01:10 linux-kernel Re: status of Preemptible Kernel 2.6.7
2004-06-16 20:03:13 linux-kernel Re: Programtically tell diff between HT and real
2004-06-16 18:46:49 linux-kernel Re: Programtically tell diff between HT and real
2004-06-16 17:56:14 linux-kernel Re: Programtically tell diff between HT and real
2004-06-06 15:44:14 linux-kernel Re: Using getpid() often, another way? [was Re: clone() <-> getpid() bug in 2.6?]
2004-06-05 23:19:57 linux-kernel Re: clone() <-> getpid() bug in 2.6?
2004-06-05 22:47:45 linux-kernel Re: clone() <-> getpid() bug in 2.6?
2004-06-05 21:48:18 linux-kernel Re: clone() <-> getpid() bug in 2.6?
2004-04-17 16:19:55 linux-kernel Re: get_task_struct()
2004-03-29 15:42:58 linux-kernel Re: Pentium M config option for 2.6
2004-03-29 15:42:58 linux-kernel Re: Pentium M config option for 2.6
2004-03-29 15:42:47 linux-kernel Re: Pentium M config option for 2.6
2004-03-19 22:13:09 linux-kernel Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads
2004-03-18 20:06:21 linux-kernel Re: use of PREEMPT_ACTIVE ?
2004-03-18 19:25:16 linux-kernel Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads
2004-03-18 17:49:54 linux-kernel Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads
2004-03-18 17:07:08 linux-kernel Re: Linux Kernel Microcode Question
2004-03-18 15:41:20 linux-kernel Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads
2004-03-18 15:39:21 linux-kernel Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads
2004-03-18 15:34:41 linux-kernel Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads
2004-03-18 00:25:00 linux-kernel Re: status of PREEMPT and SMP together?
2004-03-17 22:00:43 linux-kernel Re: status of PREEMPT and SMP together?
2004-01-25 01:43:38 linux-kernel Re: 2.6.1 dual xeon
2004-01-14 19:21:11 linux-kernel Re: Laptops & CPU frequency
2004-01-13 23:49:23 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] rq->curr==p not equivalent to task_running(rq,p)
2004-01-11 17:54:46 linux-kernel Re: Laptops & CPU frequency