Chris Friesen ([email protected])

Number of posts: 477 (0.24 per day)
First post: 2005-02-01 00:30:52
Last post: 2010-08-04 19:04:13

Date	List	Subject
2008-01-10 18:12:50	linux-kernel	Re: questions on NAPI processing latency and dropped network packets
2008-01-10 17:24:40	linux-kernel	questions on NAPI processing latency and dropped network packets
2008-01-09 22:59:26	linux-kernel	Re: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl
2008-01-08 18:00:29	linux-kernel	looking for help with mpt fusion driver log: "FAULT code = 1804h"
2007-12-18 14:53:21	linux-kernel	Re: "ip neigh show" not showing arp cache entries?
2007-12-17 20:11:52	linux-kernel	Re: "ip neigh show" not showing arp cache entries?
2007-12-17 15:33:46	linux-kernel	Re: "ip neigh show" not showing arp cache entries?
2007-12-12 21:58:17	linux-kernel	Re: "ip neigh show" not showing arp cache entries?
2007-12-12 18:26:29	linux-kernel	Re: "ip neigh show" not showing arp cache entries?
2007-12-12 16:22:17	linux-kernel	Re: "ip neigh show" not showing arp cache entries?
2007-12-10 17:55:22	linux-kernel	Re: "ip neigh show" not showing arp cache entries?
2007-12-10 17:36:20	linux-kernel	"ip neigh show" not showing arp cache entries?
2007-12-10 16:06:17	linux-kernel	Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
2007-12-07 04:21:57	linux-kernel	Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
2007-12-06 23:42:32	linux-kernel	Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
2007-12-06 23:03:08	linux-kernel	Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
2007-12-06 21:50:17	linux-kernel	Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
2007-12-06 20:37:23	linux-kernel	Re: New Address Family: Inter Process Networking (IPN)
2007-12-04 20:46:45	linux-kernel	Re: solid state drive access and context switching
2007-12-04 17:27:49	linux-kernel	when using arp monitoring with bonding, why use broadcast arps?
2007-12-03 23:06:42	linux-kernel	solid state drive access and context switching
2007-12-03 19:57:27	linux-kernel	Re: sched_yield: delete sysctl_sched_compat_yield
2007-12-03 17:38:21	linux-kernel	Re: sched_yield: delete sysctl_sched_compat_yield
2007-11-15 22:12:22	linux-kernel	Re: mmap dirty limits on 32 bit kernels (Was: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs)
2007-11-15 17:06:00	linux-kernel	Re: OT: Does Linux have any "Perfect Code"
2007-11-13 16:00:40	linux-kernel	questions on details of sg_ioctl
2007-11-12 22:44:16	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH 2/2] [e1000 VLAN] Disable vlan hw accel when promiscuous mode
2007-11-08 14:43:50	linux-kernel	Re: compat_sys_times() bogus until jiffies >= 0.
2007-10-26 17:55:51	linux-kernel	Re: Is gcc thread-unsafe?
2007-10-19 16:59:19	linux-kernel	Re: OOM notifications
2007-10-19 05:16:16	linux-kernel	Re: OOM notifications
2007-10-01 17:46:00	linux-kernel	Re: Network slowdown due to CFS
2007-10-01 16:56:17	linux-kernel	Re: Network slowdown due to CFS
2007-09-21 15:39:01	linux-kernel	question on kernel rwsem behaviour
2007-09-19 20:00:49	linux-kernel	Re: CFS: some bad numbers with Java/database threading [FIXED]
2007-09-19 19:48:40	linux-kernel	Re: CFS: some bad numbers with Java/database threading [FIXED]
2007-09-13 23:26:21	linux-kernel	Re: RFC: bug in load_elf_binary?
2007-09-12 20:45:26	linux-kernel	Re: OOPS in __copy_user_zeroing_intel
2007-09-12 18:36:20	linux-kernel	RFC: bug in load_elf_binary?
2007-09-12 18:18:00	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH/RFC] doc: about email clients for Linux kernel patches
2007-09-12 03:27:15	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH/RFC] doc: about email clients for Linux kernel patches
2007-09-11 19:38:18	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH/RFC] doc: about email clients for Linux kernel patches
2007-09-11 15:43:34	linux-kernel	OOPS in __copy_user_zeroing_intel
2007-09-10 21:28:57	linux-kernel	RFC: possible bug in load_elf_binary
2007-09-04 19:28:44	linux-kernel	Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
2007-08-17 18:51:19	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
2007-08-16 16:55:20	linux-kernel	Re: dual Xeon hyperthread system only showing up as 2 cpus
2007-08-16 02:20:52	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
2007-08-15 23:17:42	linux-kernel	dual Xeon hyperthread system only showing up as 2 cpus
2007-08-09 20:11:45	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH 24/24] document volatile atomic_read() behavior
2007-08-08 04:50:47	linux-kernel	Re: why are some atomic_t's not volatile, while most are?