Chris Snook ([email protected])

Number of posts: 286 (0.59 per day)
First post: 2006-09-01 01:04:35
Last post: 2007-12-28 18:45:16

Previous Page / Next Page
Date List Subject
2007-10-16 16:03:20 linux-kernel Re: NVIDIA Ethernet & invalid MAC
2007-10-09 05:09:11 linux-kernel Re: gigabit ethernet power consumption
2007-10-02 17:11:53 linux-kernel Re: One process with multiple user ids.
2007-09-29 18:34:19 linux-kernel Re: Bonnie++ with 1024k stripe SW/RAID5 causes kernel to goto D-state
2007-09-26 06:37:16 linux-kernel [PATCH RESEND] x86_64: make atomic64_t work like atomic_t
2007-09-19 18:33:29 linux-kernel Re: patch/option to wipe memory at boot?
2007-09-17 15:45:39 linux-kernel Re: CPU usage for 10Gbps UDP transfers
2007-09-13 21:30:55 linux-kernel Re: irq load balancing
2007-09-13 15:39:14 linux-kernel [PATCH] x86_64: make atomic64_t semantics consistent with atomic_t
2007-09-13 13:41:26 linux-kernel Re: Lossy interrupts on x86_64
2007-09-12 21:45:24 linux-kernel Re: irq load balancing
2007-09-10 23:27:44 linux-kernel [PATCH] Document non-semantics of atomic_read() and atomic_set()
2007-09-10 15:35:37 linux-kernel Re: Health monitor of a multi-threaded process
2007-09-05 19:56:17 linux-kernel Re: modinfo <modulename> question
2007-09-04 12:59:54 linux-kernel Re: mutex vs cache coherency protocol(for multiprocessor )
2007-09-04 12:48:46 linux-kernel Re: HIMEM calculation
2007-09-03 23:41:17 linux-kernel Re: HIMEM calculation
2007-08-31 22:27:21 linux-kernel Re: [ANNOUNCE] DeskOpt - on fly task, i/o scheduler optimization
2007-08-29 13:49:33 linux-kernel Re: Fork Bombing Patch
2007-08-24 20:36:51 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix a couple busy loops in mach_wakecpu.h:wait_for_init_deassert()
2007-08-23 19:01:59 linux-kernel Re: Fork Bombing Patch
2007-08-22 14:07:25 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 11/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on m32r
2007-08-21 19:22:29 linux-kernel Re: tracking MAINTAINERS versus tracking SUBSYSTEMS
2007-08-21 14:01:19 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
2007-08-20 19:31:57 linux-kernel Re: tracking MAINTAINERS versus tracking SUBSYSTEMS
2007-08-20 14:42:58 linux-kernel Re: Fork Bombing Patch
2007-08-20 13:39:55 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
2007-08-20 13:37:38 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
2007-08-20 13:29:30 linux-kernel Re: LDD3 pitfalls (was Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures)
2007-08-20 13:16:57 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
2007-08-17 06:25:21 linux-kernel Re: RFHelp: Splitting MAINTAINERS into maintainers/* and Makefile/Kconfig support
2007-08-17 02:05:46 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
2007-08-16 21:06:31 linux-kernel Re: Fork Bombing Patch
2007-08-16 20:47:29 linux-kernel Re: Self healing in linux ?
2007-08-16 20:03:37 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
2007-08-16 20:02:21 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
2007-08-16 19:58:46 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
2007-08-16 19:24:21 linux-kernel Re: [patch 1/2] i386: use asm() like the other atomic operations already do.
2007-08-15 17:55:59 linux-kernel [RFP] atomic[64]_[read|set] asm implementations
2007-08-15 17:03:32 linux-kernel Re: [patch 1/2] i386: use asm() like the other atomic operations already do.
2007-08-15 16:14:27 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
2007-08-14 23:26:50 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 1/23] document preferred use of volatile with atomic_t
2007-08-14 23:06:01 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
2007-08-14 22:54:09 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 1/23] document preferred use of volatile with atomic_t
2007-08-14 22:46:29 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
2007-08-14 22:26:50 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 10/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on ia64
2007-08-14 18:50:37 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 10/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on ia64
2007-08-13 18:40:29 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] [74/2many] MAINTAINERS - ATL1 ETHERNET DRIVER
2007-08-13 15:07:42 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 3/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on arm
2007-08-13 14:45:04 linux-kernel [PATCH 23/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on xtensa
2007-08-13 14:42:49 linux-kernel [PATCH 22/23] make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behavior consistent on x86_64