simo ([email protected])

Number of posts: 15 (0.01 per day)
First post: 2006-12-18 16:41:53
Last post: 2013-08-19 12:44:31

Date	List	Subject
2013-08-19 12:44:31	linux-nfs	Re: [PATCH] NFS: fix NFSv3 with sec=krb5 and CONFIG_NFS_V3_ACL=y
2013-06-15 15:12:59	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] locks: don't walk inode->i_flock list in locks_show
2013-06-15 15:12:55	linux-nfs	Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] locks: don't walk inode->i_flock list in locks_show
2012-12-07 15:37:47	linux-nfs	Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add O_DENY* flags to fcntl and cifs
2012-11-29 22:26:39	linux-nfs	Re: Possible to make nfs aware of a inotify watch has been set.
2012-11-29 20:05:58	linux-nfs	Re: Possible to make nfs aware of a inotify watch has been set.
2012-11-29 15:27:51	linux-nfs	Re: Possible to make nfs aware of a inotify watch has been set.
2012-04-21 01:45:46	linux-nfs	Re: NFSv4 ACLs
2008-01-19 08:52:19	linux-kernel	Re: [linux-cifs-client] [PATCH] Remove information leak in Linux CIFS client
2007-05-04 17:43:16	linux-kernel	Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: SMB2 file system - should it be a distinct module
2007-05-03 14:56:28	linux-kernel	Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: SMB2 file system - should it be a distinct module
2007-05-03 14:53:20	linux-kernel	Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: SMB2 file system - should it be a distinct module
2007-05-03 14:36:56	linux-kernel	Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: SMB2 file system - should it be a distinct module
2007-05-03 13:55:52	linux-kernel	Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: SMB2 file system - should it be a distinct module
2006-12-18 16:41:53	linux-kernel	Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: 2.6.19.1 bug? tar: file changed as we read it