Andrew Morton ([email protected])

Number of posts: 261 (0.97 per day)
First post: 2000-10-27 10:25:05
Last post: 2001-07-23 12:19:21

Date	List	Subject
2000-11-29 07:47:13	linux-kernel	Re: OOps in exec_usermodehelper
2000-11-28 15:21:00	linux-kernel	Re: OOps in exec_usermodehelper
2000-11-26 00:20:18	linux-kernel	Re: PROBLEM: crashing kernels
2000-11-24 12:58:59	linux-kernel	Re: OOPS on bringing down ppp
2000-11-22 12:05:33	linux-kernel	Re: hardcoded HZ in hub.c
2000-11-22 11:53:12	linux-kernel	Re: hardcoded HZ in hub.c
2000-11-20 14:10:11	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] semaphore fairness patch against test11-pre6
2000-11-19 13:21:36	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] semaphore fairness patch against test11-pre6
2000-11-19 01:43:18	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] semaphore fairness patch against test11-pre6
2000-11-18 04:32:12	linux-kernel	[patch] potential death in disassociate_ctty()
2000-11-18 04:24:59	linux-kernel	[patch] Remove tq_scheduler
2000-11-18 04:24:19	linux-kernel	[patch] semaphore optimisation
2000-11-18 04:23:39	linux-kernel	IGNORE Previous! [patch] Removal of oops->printk deadlocks
2000-11-18 04:21:59	linux-kernel	[patch] remove oops->printk deadlock
2000-11-18 04:21:59	linux-kernel	[patch] SMP race in exit()
2000-11-16 10:37:25	linux-kernel	Re: testXX and PPPD 2.4.0-release
2000-11-15 13:53:50	linux-kernel	Re: [prepatch] removal of oops->printk deadlocks
2000-11-15 12:09:31	linux-kernel	Re: [prepatch] removal of oops->printk deadlocks
2000-11-15 11:47:37	linux-kernel	Re: [prepatch] removal of oops->printk deadlocks
2000-11-15 11:38:18	linux-kernel	Re: [prepatch] removal of oops->printk deadlocks
2000-11-14 11:07:09	linux-kernel	[prepatch] removal of oops->printk deadlocks
2000-11-13 12:11:24	linux-kernel	Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem
2000-11-13 11:20:40	linux-kernel	Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem
2000-11-12 01:37:23	linux-kernel	Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem
2000-11-11 03:09:45	linux-kernel	Re: Wild thangs, was: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue
2000-11-11 02:45:56	linux-kernel	Re: Wild thangs, was: sendmail fails to deliver mail with attachments in /var/spool/mqueue
2000-11-11 00:49:13	linux-kernel	Re: PATCH: 8139too kernel thread
2000-11-11 00:25:21	linux-kernel	Re: 2.4.0-test11pre2-ac1 and previous problem
2000-11-11 00:22:12	linux-kernel	Re: test11-pre2 compile error undefined reference to `bust_spinlocks' WHAT?!
2000-11-07 12:54:58	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of
2000-11-07 07:25:12	linux-kernel	Re: locks.c: removal of semaphores
2000-11-06 10:47:01	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] document ECN in 2.4 Configure.help
2000-11-06 09:56:36	linux-kernel	Re: Locking Between User Context and Soft IRQs in 2.4.0
2000-11-05 11:46:37	linux-kernel	Re: Locking Between User Context and Soft IRQs in 2.4.0
2000-11-05 01:52:53	linux-kernel	Re: Locking Between User Context and Soft IRQs in 2.4.0
2000-11-05 01:31:55	linux-kernel	Re: Locking Between User Context and Soft IRQs in 2.4.0
2000-11-04 23:58:18	linux-kernel	Re: Multithreaded locks.c
2000-11-04 14:42:35	linux-kernel	Multithreaded locks.c
2000-11-04 05:29:00	linux-kernel	Re: [patch] NE2000
2000-11-04 05:09:03	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was:Strange performance behavior of 2.4.0-test9)
2000-11-04 05:07:43	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was: Strange performance behavior of 2.4.0-test9)
2000-11-02 08:28:50	linux-kernel	Re: [2.2.17] 3c59x and Transmit list error
2000-11-02 07:21:22	linux-kernel	Re: 3-order allocation failed
2000-10-31 15:37:13	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was: Strange performance behavior of 2.4.0-test9)
2000-10-30 15:00:58	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was: Strange performance behavior of 2.4.0-test9)
2000-10-30 13:53:03	linux-kernel	Re: ide/disk perf?
2000-10-28 16:47:03	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was: Strange performance behavior of 2.4.0-test9)
2000-10-28 16:19:12	linux-kernel	Re: RTNL assert
2000-10-28 16:11:04	linux-kernel	Re: [PROPOSED PATCH] ATM refcount + firestream
2000-10-28 15:47:08	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was: Strange performance behavior of 2.4.0-test9)
2000-10-28 10:53:13	linux-kernel	Re: RTNL assert