David Schwartz ([email protected])

Number of posts: 700 (0.24 per day)
First post: 2000-10-27 18:53:27
Last post: 2008-12-19 00:46:43

Previous Page / Next Page
Date List Subject
2003-05-18 17:33:31 linux-kernel RE: Scheduling problem with 2.4?
2003-05-18 00:03:41 linux-kernel RE: Scheduling problem with 2.4?
2003-05-15 00:36:42 linux-kernel RE: The disappearing sys_call_table export.
2003-05-14 19:28:08 linux-kernel RE: What exactly does "supports Linux" mean?
2003-05-11 22:44:42 linux-kernel RE: The disappearing sys_call_table export.
2003-05-06 22:09:04 linux-kernel RE: Using GPL'd Linux drivers with non-GPL, binary-only kernel
2003-05-06 19:33:13 linux-kernel RE: The disappearing sys_call_table export.
2003-05-04 20:43:20 linux-kernel RE: fcntl file locking and pthreads
2003-05-04 18:28:28 linux-kernel RE: fcntl file locking and pthreads
2003-05-02 03:21:58 linux-kernel RE: Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to a crisp!]
2003-05-02 02:58:37 linux-kernel RE: Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to a crisp!]
2003-05-01 22:56:14 linux-kernel RE: Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to a crisp!]
2003-05-01 19:36:53 linux-kernel RE: Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to a crisp!]
2003-03-21 12:24:52 linux-kernel Re: read() & close()
2003-03-18 03:46:05 linux-kernel Re: Never ever send Pavel private mail unless you want him to publish
2003-03-02 23:35:42 linux-kernel Re: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 1.1.0 - A tool for managing Soft RAID under Linux
2003-02-13 02:32:07 linux-kernel Re: Monta Vista software license terms
2003-02-12 23:18:35 linux-kernel Re: Monta Vista software license terms
2003-02-12 22:21:33 linux-kernel Re: Monta Vista software license terms
2003-02-12 21:20:35 linux-kernel Re: Monta Vista software license terms
2003-02-12 20:08:56 linux-kernel Re: Monta Vista software license terms
2003-02-12 04:03:31 linux-kernel Re: Monta Vista software license terms
2003-02-11 22:01:53 linux-kernel Re: Monta Vista software license terms
2003-02-11 19:30:14 linux-kernel Re: Monta Vista software license terms
2003-02-10 21:24:06 linux-kernel Re: Monta Vista software license terms
2003-01-21 20:54:59 linux-kernel Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-21 18:25:12 linux-kernel Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-20 21:18:21 linux-kernel Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-20 21:05:49 linux-kernel Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-20 20:10:06 linux-kernel Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-20 19:40:53 linux-kernel Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-20 19:40:51 linux-kernel Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-20 18:51:37 linux-kernel Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-20 18:44:27 linux-kernel Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-20 00:56:02 linux-kernel Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-20 00:29:36 linux-kernel Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-19 23:48:42 linux-kernel Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-18 07:14:39 linux-kernel Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-18 04:48:21 linux-kernel Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-12 07:04:19 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-12 07:00:31 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-12 04:10:48 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-06 21:55:46 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?
2003-01-05 21:58:21 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?
2003-01-05 05:28:16 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?
2003-01-05 00:18:07 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-05 00:09:01 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?
2003-01-04 03:02:02 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?
2003-01-04 01:24:51 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-03 16:49:34 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-03 16:10:02 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?