Date |
List |
Subject |
2004-11-30 18:54:29
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: Concurrent access to /dev/urandom |
2004-11-30 02:38:26
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: Concurrent access to /dev/urandom |
2004-11-27 21:36:47
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: no entropy and no output at /dev/random (quick question) |
2004-11-18 15:50:15
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: GPL version, "at your option"? |
2004-11-18 01:10:11
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: GPL version, "at your option"? |
2004-11-10 05:08:13
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox +code |
2004-11-10 01:49:23
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox +code |
2004-11-10 01:47:39
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox +code |
2004-11-09 20:23:23
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox +code |
2004-11-09 19:31:08
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox +code |
2004-11-08 21:56:04
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox + code |
2004-11-08 21:05:23
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox + code |
2004-11-08 20:59:26
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox +code |
2004-11-08 01:15:09
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: GPL Violation of 'sveasoft' with GPL Linux Kernel/Busybox + code |
2004-11-06 20:09:49
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: Possible GPL infringement in Broadcom-based routers |
2004-11-05 20:03:23
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: Possible GPL infringement in Broadcom-based routers |
2004-11-05 19:03:39
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: Possible GPL infringement in Broadcom-based routers |
2004-11-05 00:00:35
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: Possible GPL infringement in Broadcom-based routers |
2004-10-31 00:21:23
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: BK kernel workflow |
2004-10-30 02:16:02
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: The requested ruling (Was: BK kernel workflow) |
2004-10-30 00:52:10
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: BK kernel workflow |
2004-10-30 00:49:00
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: BK kernel workflow |
2004-10-29 16:58:55
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: BK kernel workflow |
2004-10-29 03:31:53
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: ICMP ttl-exceeded packets not sourced correctly |
2004-10-29 00:32:54
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: BK kernel workflow |
2004-10-28 23:26:37
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: BK kernel workflow |
2004-10-28 19:27:40
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: BK kernel workflow |
2004-10-24 01:58:33
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: SCO's copyright claims or lack thereof (was: Re: Linux v2.6.9 and GPL Buyout) |
2004-10-23 00:37:04
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: Linux v2.6.9 and GPL Buyout |
2004-10-21 21:01:04
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: Reporting GPL violations - a little OT |
2004-10-21 01:45:57
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug? |
2004-10-20 23:30:19
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug? |
2004-10-17 18:53:52
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug? |
2004-10-17 00:32:47
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug? |
2004-10-17 00:29:54
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug? |
2004-10-17 00:29:39
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug? |
2004-10-16 05:00:45
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug? |
2004-10-16 04:23:55
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug? |
2004-10-15 23:35:08
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug? |
2004-10-13 23:35:50
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: VM Vs Swap Space |
2004-10-11 20:05:57
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: possible GPL violation by Free |
2004-10-11 02:07:24
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: possible GPL violation by Free |
2004-10-10 21:55:44
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: possible GPL violation by Free |
2004-10-09 18:28:35
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug? |
2004-10-08 00:26:24
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug? |
2004-10-07 19:35:35
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug? |
2004-09-15 20:43:09
|
linux-kernel
|
Re: The ultimate TOE design |
2004-06-19 00:13:47
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? |
2004-06-18 00:05:23
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: Using kernel headers that are not for the running kernel |
2004-06-17 18:43:32
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: more files with licenses that aren't GPL-compatible |
2004-06-16 23:45:39
|
linux-kernel
|
RE: more files with licenses that aren't GPL-compatible |