Max Krasnyansky ([email protected])

Number of posts: 585 (0.18 per day)
First post: 2001-07-13 16:07:48
Last post: 2010-05-06 22:30:13

Next Page
Date List Subject
2012-02-14 18:14:27 linux-kernel Re: NoHZ and CPU isolation patches
2010-07-12 18:21:42 linux-kernel Re: Fw: sysfs bug when using tun with network namespaces
2010-05-06 22:30:13 linux-bluetooth Re: multiple HCI_UART protocols over hci_ldisc
2009-12-12 07:09:19 linux-kernel Re: -next: Nov 12 - kernel BUG at kernel/sched.c:7359!
2009-11-18 05:52:52 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Documentation, clarify tuntap IPX example.
2009-11-18 01:40:17 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Documentation, clarify tuntap IPX example.
2008-12-23 21:33:18 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 1/1] Userspace I/O (UIO): Add support for userspace DMA
2008-11-24 21:47:26 linux-kernel Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance
2008-11-24 21:46:25 linux-kernel Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance
2008-11-22 07:03:54 linux-kernel Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance
2008-11-21 20:04:35 linux-kernel Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance
2008-11-20 02:13:08 linux-kernel Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance
2008-11-19 20:17:50 linux-kernel Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance
2008-11-19 20:01:58 linux-kernel Re: Using cpusets for configuration/isolation [Was Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance]
2008-11-19 19:49:47 linux-kernel Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance
2008-11-19 16:32:15 linux-kernel Re: Using cpusets for configuration/isolation [Was Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance]
2008-11-19 16:28:25 linux-kernel Re: Using cpusets for configuration/isolation [Was Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance]
2008-11-19 06:43:47 linux-kernel Re: default IRQ affinity change in v2.6.27 (breaking several SMP PPC based systems)
2008-11-19 05:14:30 linux-kernel Re: Using cpusets for configuration/isolation [Was Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance]
2008-11-19 02:00:15 linux-kernel Re: Using cpusets for configuration/isolation [Was Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance]
2008-11-19 01:33:58 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] cpuset: fix regression when failed to generate sched domains
2008-08-29 20:30:17 linux-kernel Re: sched_mc_power_savings broken with CGROUPS+CPUSETS
2008-08-29 20:17:18 linux-kernel Re: sched_mc_power_savings broken with CGROUPS+CPUSETS
2008-08-29 20:11:56 linux-kernel [PATCH] sched: arch_reinit_sched_domains() must destroy domains to force rebuild
2008-08-28 16:33:34 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default
2008-08-28 16:19:20 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default
2008-08-19 18:34:16 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 2/6] sched: rt-bandwidth accounting fix
2008-08-19 18:15:40 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default
2008-08-18 18:02:03 linux-kernel Re: SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR broken by cfs
2008-08-14 18:21:58 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling (take 4)
2008-08-12 16:39:18 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling (take 4)
2008-08-12 03:27:53 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling (take 4)
2008-08-12 00:17:53 linux-kernel Circular vma locking with kvm, seems to be mmu notifiers related
2008-08-11 22:50:04 linux-kernel Re: Regression in 2.6.27-rc1 for set_cpus_allowed_ptr
2008-08-11 22:14:18 linux-kernel Re: Regression in 2.6.27-rc1 for set_cpus_allowed_ptr
2008-08-11 21:57:37 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] cpu hotplug, sched:Introduce cpu_active_map and redoscheddomainmanagment (take 2)
2008-08-11 21:55:45 linux-kernel [PATCH] Resurect proper handling of maxcpus= kernel option (take 2)
2008-08-11 21:39:00 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling (take 4)
2008-08-11 21:34:16 linux-kernel [PATCH] cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling (take 4)
2008-08-11 18:47:10 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Resurect proper handling of maxcpus= kernel option
2008-08-11 18:40:17 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Resurect proper handling of maxcpus= kernel option
2008-08-11 18:28:51 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Resurect proper handling of maxcpus= kernel option
2008-08-07 17:23:20 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Resurect proper handling of maxcpus= kernel option
2008-08-07 17:21:26 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Resurect proper handling of maxcpus= kernel option
2008-08-06 20:44:22 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] cpuset : Handling improper memory allocation.
2008-08-06 20:36:47 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling (2.6.27-rc1)
2008-08-06 20:35:44 linux-kernel Re: [patch 0/5] x86-microcode: run ucode update via workqueue
2008-08-06 20:34:32 linux-kernel Re: [patch 3/5] [PATCH 3/5] x86: Run Intel ucode-updates via workqueue.
2008-08-06 20:23:44 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Resurect proper handling of maxcpus= kernel option
2008-08-06 20:22:07 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling (2.6.27-rc1)
2008-08-06 20:13:45 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] cpuset : Handling improper memory allocation.