dean gaudet ([email protected])

Number of posts: 127 (0.07 per day)
First post: 2000-10-29 19:46:13
Last post: 2005-12-15 20:58:42

Previous Page
Date List Subject
2001-04-30 21:48:02 linux-kernel Re: X15 alpha release: as fast as TUX but in user space
2001-04-30 05:44:24 linux-kernel Re: X15 alpha release: as fast as TUX but in user space
2001-04-29 16:22:58 linux-kernel Re: X15 alpha release: as fast as TUX but in user space (fwd)
2001-04-17 15:32:30 linux-kernel Re: Broken ARP (was Re: ARP responses broken!)
2001-03-06 13:15:24 linux-kernel Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's
2001-03-06 13:03:54 linux-kernel Re: scsi vs ide performance on fsync's
2001-03-03 22:40:38 linux-kernel Re: strange nonmonotonic behavior of gettimeoftheday -- seen similar problem on PPC
2001-02-22 04:53:40 linux-kernel Re: ARP out the wrong interface
2001-02-09 05:22:47 linux-kernel Re: ARP out the wrong interface
2001-02-09 05:10:17 linux-kernel ARP out the wrong interface
2001-02-09 00:36:37 linux-kernel Re: dentry cache order 7 is broken
2001-02-08 07:15:58 linux-kernel dentry cache order 7 is broken
2000-12-30 04:51:54 linux-kernel Re: linux 2.2.19pre and thttpd (VM-global problem?)
2000-12-12 23:54:53 linux-kernel Re: how to capture long oops w/o having second machine
2000-11-07 09:27:43 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of
2000-11-07 05:24:19 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of
2000-11-07 04:47:15 linux-kernel Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a user-land programmer...
2000-11-05 20:22:16 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of
2000-11-05 04:52:34 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was:Strange
2000-11-04 20:11:40 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was:Strange performance behavior of 2.4.0-test9)
2000-11-04 20:03:48 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was:Strange performance behavior of 2.4.0-test9)
2000-11-03 21:34:35 linux-kernel Re: Can EINTR be handled the way BSD handles it? -- a plea from a user-land programmer...
2000-11-03 05:52:46 linux-kernel Re: select() bug
2000-10-30 23:24:53 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was: Strange performance behavior of 2.4.0-test9)
2000-10-29 19:46:13 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was: