Larry McVoy ([email protected])

Number of posts: 1136 (0.22 per day)
First post: 1998-12-07 21:20:45
Last post: 2012-10-13 02:30:03

Date	List	Subject
2003-02-05 00:18:17	linux-kernel	Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
2003-02-04 23:11:35	linux-kernel	Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance
2003-01-31 22:41:38	linux-kernel	Re: bkbits.net downtime
2003-01-31 21:05:24	linux-kernel	bkbits.net downtime
2003-01-27 17:04:02	linux-kernel	Re: [FYI} The cygwin tool chain can *almost* build a 2.5.59 kernel
2003-01-25 23:01:42	linux-kernel	Re: your mail
2003-01-25 02:17:42	linux-kernel	Re: your mail
2003-01-23 23:19:25	linux-kernel	Re: debate on 700 threads vs asynchronous code
2003-01-22 15:29:18	linux-kernel	Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-22 15:09:31	linux-kernel	Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-21 19:13:03	linux-kernel	Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-21 18:21:25	linux-kernel	Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him
2003-01-18 06:30:26	linux-kernel	Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-18 05:20:25	linux-kernel	Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
2003-01-18 00:48:01	linux-kernel	Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him
2003-01-17 04:16:48	linux-kernel	Re: Linux 2.5.59
2003-01-17 04:09:59	linux-kernel	Re: Linux 2.5.59
2003-01-17 04:08:48	linux-kernel	Re: Linux 2.5.59
2003-01-16 19:20:16	linux-kernel	disk space on bkbits.net
2003-01-16 15:31:12	linux-kernel	Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ?
2003-01-16 14:31:58	linux-kernel	Re: any brand recomendation for a linux laptop ?
2003-01-16 00:21:56	linux-kernel	Re: 2.5 BK broken?
2003-01-15 16:54:50	linux-kernel	BK/s390?
2003-01-14 20:37:14	linux-kernel	Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him
2003-01-14 19:53:17	linux-kernel	Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him
2003-01-14 18:57:13	linux-kernel	Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-13 20:12:25	linux-kernel	Re: Linux v2.5.57
2003-01-11 02:46:10	linux-kernel	Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-11 02:33:07	linux-kernel	Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-11 02:08:59	linux-kernel	Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-11 01:58:56	linux-kernel	Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-09 23:30:43	linux-kernel	Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-09 23:17:06	linux-kernel	Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-09 23:12:06	linux-kernel	Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-08 13:42:31	linux-kernel	Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-08 00:59:27	linux-kernel	Re: Linux iSCSI Initiator, OpenSource (fwd) (Re: Gauntlet Set NOW!)
2003-01-08 00:22:22	linux-kernel	Re: Honest does not pay here ...
2003-01-07 14:17:38	linux-kernel	Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-06 17:28:34	linux-kernel	Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-06 00:55:18	linux-kernel	Re: Honest does not pay here ...
2003-01-05 14:47:08	linux-kernel	Re: Documentation/BK-usage/bksend problems?
2003-01-05 14:43:01	linux-kernel	Re: Honest does not pay here ...
2003-01-04 22:16:22	linux-kernel	Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-04 02:14:09	linux-kernel	Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?
2003-01-04 01:26:06	linux-kernel	Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-03 21:47:32	linux-kernel	Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-03 21:23:34	linux-kernel	Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-03 21:18:07	linux-kernel	Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?
2003-01-03 20:30:41	linux-kernel	Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-03 17:45:33	linux-kernel	Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-03 16:36:50	linux-kernel	Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?