David Gibson ([email protected])

Number of posts: 830 (0.14 per day)
First post: 2001-12-06 16:44:01
Last post: 2017-11-30 04:03:53

Date List Subject
2013-09-19 13:22:59 linux-kernel Re: [dtc RFC PATCH] Enforce node name unit-address presence/absence
2013-09-19 13:22:57 linux-kernel Re: [dtc RFC PATCH] Enforce node name unit-address presence/absence
2013-09-19 13:22:53 linux-kernel Re: [dtc RFC PATCH] Enforce node name unit-address presence/absence
2013-09-19 01:52:18 linux-kernel Re: "memory" binding issues
2013-09-18 03:03:56 linux-kernel Re: "memory" binding issues
2013-09-16 12:08:25 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH v2 19/20] mm, hugetlb: retry if failed to allocate and there is concurrent user
2013-09-05 01:15:52 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH v2 19/20] mm, hugetlb: retry if failed to allocate and there is concurrent user
2013-09-05 01:15:51 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH v2 19/20] mm, hugetlb: retry if failed to allocate and there is concurrent user
2013-08-09 00:27:27 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 17/18] mm, hugetlb: retry if we fail to allocate a hugepage with use_reserve
2013-08-07 01:32:59 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 17/18] mm, hugetlb: retry if we fail to allocate a hugepage with use_reserve
2013-08-04 09:48:39 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 17/18] mm, hugetlb: retry if we fail to allocate a hugepage with use_reserve
2013-08-02 04:27:40 linux-kernel Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
2013-07-30 03:58:53 linux-kernel Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
2013-07-30 01:57:27 linux-kernel Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] Defining schemas for Device Tree
2013-07-30 01:48:26 linux-kernel Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
2013-07-29 23:49:10 linux-kernel Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
2013-07-29 23:45:26 linux-kernel Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] Defining schemas for Device Tree
2013-07-29 22:43:16 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] mm, hugetlb: do not use a page in page cache for cow optimization
2013-07-29 22:30:34 linux-kernel Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
2013-07-29 22:30:33 linux-kernel Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] Defining schemas for Device Tree
2013-07-29 09:10:20 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 17/18] mm, hugetlb: retry if we fail to allocate a hugepage with use_reserve
2013-07-28 21:58:06 linux-kernel Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
2013-07-27 15:28:37 linux-kernel Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
2013-07-27 15:28:36 linux-kernel Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
2013-07-22 02:30:53 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Refactor device tree maintainership
2013-07-21 12:34:31 linux-kernel Re: The future of DT binding maintainership
2013-07-19 07:14:26 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] hugepage: allow parallelization of the hugepage fault path
2013-07-16 10:04:50 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: per-vma instantiation mutexes
2013-07-16 08:25:07 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: per-vma instantiation mutexes
2013-07-16 08:25:05 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: per-vma instantiation mutexes
2013-07-15 07:24:27 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: per-vma instantiation mutexes
2013-06-27 11:06:19 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for IOMMU in-kernel handling
2013-06-24 03:54:41 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for IOMMU in-kernel handling
2013-06-24 03:54:40 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for IOMMU in-kernel handling
2013-06-22 12:05:59 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for IOMMU in-kernel handling
2013-06-20 06:55:13 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for IOMMU in-kernel handling
2013-06-01 05:44:55 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH V2] dtc: ensure #line directives don't consume data from the next line
2013-05-25 02:45:45 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for IOMMU in-kernel handling
2013-03-25 02:20:20 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] vfio powerpc: implement IOMMU driver for VFIO
2013-03-21 03:02:50 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] vfio powerpc: implement IOMMU driver for VFIO
2012-11-27 05:12:25 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfio powerpc: implemented IOMMU driver for VFIO
2012-11-15 05:26:26 linux-kernel Re: [RFC] Device Tree Overlays Proposal (Was Re: capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2)
2012-11-13 23:29:18 linux-kernel Re: [RFC] Device Tree Overlays Proposal (Was Re: capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2)
2012-11-13 07:23:56 linux-kernel Re: [RFC] Device Tree Overlays Proposal (Was Re: capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2)
2012-11-13 07:23:55 linux-kernel Re: [RFC] Device Tree Overlays Proposal (Was Re: capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2)
2012-11-13 02:36:30 linux-kernel Re: [RFC] Device Tree Overlays Proposal (Was Re: capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2)
2012-11-13 01:06:14 linux-kernel Re: [RFC] Device Tree Overlays Proposal (Was Re: capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2)
2012-11-13 00:30:52 linux-kernel Re: [RFC] Device Tree Overlays Proposal (Was Re: capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2)
2012-11-13 00:30:51 linux-kernel Re: [RFC] Device Tree Overlays Proposal (Was Re: capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2)
2012-11-09 14:27:38 linux-kernel Re: [RFC] Device Tree Overlays Proposal (Was Re: capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2)
2012-11-09 02:24:51 linux-kernel Re: [RFC] Device Tree Overlays Proposal (Was Re: capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2)