Victor Yodaiken ([email protected])

Number of posts: 178 (0.43 per day)
First post: 2000-11-05 00:35:16
Last post: 2001-12-28 00:13:03

Date List Subject
2003-09-24 21:19:19 linux-kernel Re: log-buf-len dynamic
2003-02-25 15:48:19 linux-kernel Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
2003-02-25 02:25:00 linux-kernel Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
2003-02-24 23:54:26 linux-kernel Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
2003-02-24 23:27:54 linux-kernel Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
2003-02-24 16:22:20 linux-kernel Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
2003-02-24 16:21:03 linux-kernel Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
2003-02-24 00:32:47 linux-kernel Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
2003-01-13 03:26:10 linux-kernel Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
2003-01-12 20:20:45 linux-kernel Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
2003-01-11 03:47:22 linux-kernel Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
2003-01-09 23:58:10 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2003-01-08 15:25:46 linux-kernel Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers?
2002-12-05 17:41:55 linux-kernel Re: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ???
2002-12-05 15:02:49 linux-kernel Re: [patch] kmalloc_percpu -- 2 of 2
2002-12-05 11:17:08 linux-kernel Re: [patch] kmalloc_percpu -- 2 of 2
2002-11-21 15:49:10 linux-kernel ANNOUNCE RTLinuxFree 3.2
2002-11-16 16:16:57 linux-kernel Re: lan based kgdb
2002-11-05 17:39:55 linux-kernel Re: What's left over.
2002-11-03 18:25:00 linux-kernel Re: Filesystem Capabilities in 2.6?
2002-11-03 16:56:02 linux-kernel Re: Filesystem Capabilities in 2.6?
2002-11-03 14:30:01 linux-kernel Re: What's left over.
2002-10-10 14:03:41 linux-kernel Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]
2002-09-18 18:32:08 linux-kernel Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK
2002-09-18 17:58:26 linux-kernel Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK
2002-09-18 15:29:23 linux-kernel Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK
2002-09-12 21:19:27 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] pid_max hang again...
2002-08-28 23:12:21 linux-kernel Re: Re: TUX2 filesystem
2002-08-28 15:16:58 linux-kernel Re: interrupt latency
2002-08-28 13:50:54 linux-kernel Re: interrupt latency
2002-08-28 13:39:29 linux-kernel Re: interrupt latency
2002-08-27 20:54:16 linux-kernel Re: interrupt latency
2002-08-27 19:51:53 linux-kernel Re: interrupt latency
2002-08-09 17:43:02 linux-kernel Re: large page patch (fwd) (fwd)
2002-08-02 15:59:16 linux-kernel Re: manipulating sigmask from filesystems and drivers
2002-07-20 14:29:36 linux-kernel Re: Alright, I give up. What does the "i" in "inode" stand for?
2002-07-19 14:18:39 linux-kernel Re: Alright, I give up. What does the "i" in "inode" stand for?
2002-07-15 19:59:54 linux-kernel Re: HZ, preferably as small as possible
2002-04-21 18:40:09 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
2002-04-21 17:20:16 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
2002-04-21 13:42:41 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
2002-03-19 23:32:25 linux-kernel Re: Bitkeeper licence issues
2002-03-19 22:14:38 linux-kernel Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile
2002-03-19 21:12:12 linux-kernel Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile
2002-03-19 17:30:11 linux-kernel Re: using kmalloc
2002-03-19 00:00:11 linux-kernel Re: Bitkeeper licence issues
2002-03-17 20:59:48 linux-kernel Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile
2002-03-17 01:55:03 linux-kernel Re: 2.4.18 Preempt Freezeups
2002-03-17 01:15:12 linux-kernel Re: 2.4.18 Preempt Freezeups
2002-03-16 23:35:57 linux-kernel Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile
2002-03-16 23:12:14 linux-kernel Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile